here are old message board entries



prev <-> next

[2001-06-06 11:49:00] - saying that riaa has the right to tell what service providers like aimster and morpheus can or cannot block is like the government telling the isps that they can or cannot allow access to certain websites. - mig

[2001-06-06 11:45:00] - http://www.sonicnet.com/news/story.jhtml?id=1444291 that's just great.  fucking FCC. - mig

[2001-06-06 11:42:00] - that's irrelevant from the legal perspective. - mig

[2001-06-06 11:23:00] - mig: do they have central servers which store the names of all the files? -dave

[2001-06-06 10:44:00] - the thing is though that the riaa is going to have a tough time going after things like aimster and morpheus because they are general purpose file-sharing and not specific to any file format. - mig

[2001-06-06 10:05:00] - paul: no problem - vinnie

[2001-06-06 09:57:00] - vinnie: Thanks for the response -paul

[2001-06-06 09:39:00] - paul: on the feminist issues -dave

[2001-06-06 09:39:00] - paul: i'm expecting payback for all that support i gave for you after you left =P -dave

[2001-06-06 09:38:00] - paul: that was a fast job ;-) -dave

[2001-06-06 09:36:00] - vinnie: Email has been sent -paul

[2001-06-06 09:02:00] - vinnie: Thanks, I'll get that email off as soon as I can (after I finish this job they gave me to do) -paul

[2001-06-06 09:00:00] - ha ha, impersonator. actually, it's vinnie.prabhu@dyncorp.com - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:58:00] - vinnie: That would be great. Yes, I need your address. -paul

[2001-06-06 08:58:00] - well, actually not really.

[2001-06-06 08:57:00] - sexyfeelings@hotmail.com - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:56:00] - hm, well time to start coding... - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:56:00] - you can e-mail me if you wish. need my address? - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:55:00] - dewey: Sorry about AIM btw, it crashed. -paul

[2001-06-06 08:53:00] - Paul: yay! :-p - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:52:00] - dewey: Don't worry, I'll ask you something maybe -paul

[2001-06-06 08:52:00] - hehe, "new word: awwwwwwwwwwww" :-D - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:51:00] - Paul: Awwwwwwwwwwww, why not? :-( - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:50:00] - vinnie: I have a question I want to ask you and I don't want anybody else to hear it -paul

[2001-06-06 08:44:00] - Aaron: if you are reading, I have an external ZIP drive and a cd burner.  I don't know how you will be able to get it to me by Friday.  Call me at 703-883-6335 - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:44:00] - why? - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:44:00] - paul: no, i almost never go on aim - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:35:00] - vinnie: Are you planning on being on AIM anytime today? -paul

[2001-06-06 08:35:00] - morpheus allows transfer of any file, but you can search for only music files, only video files, and so on - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:31:00] - " in it, and then I sort it by name and then look at the to find what I want.  But if people label them weird, or if it is a 96K song I don't know until I download and try it... - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:29:00] - Is morpheus specific to music files?  The problem with Bearshare is I just tell it to find files with "mp3

[2001-06-06 08:27:00] - morpheus is good if you have a fast connection, but afaik it automatically deletes songs that don't finish, even if near the end - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:26:00] - dewey: not popular enough. yet - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:25:00] - hm, why hasn't Audiogalaxy been shutdown yet? - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:23:00] - I did it over winter break freshman year with Napster and "DC101's top 100" easily, but it is harder with BearShare because of all the junk out there. - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:22:00] - I am trying to get the complete list of "HFS Top 500 songs of the 90's" and the gnutella network doesn't seem to have many of the songs. - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:21:00] - oo, that is cool. - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:21:00] - i've never used bearshare, so i couldn't tell you how good it is - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:20:00] - i think audiogalaxy has a central server though, like napster. easy to shut down - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:20:00] - audiogalaxy is neat because you choose what songs you want, and when someone comes online who has the song, it automatically downloads it - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:19:00] - better than BearShare? - deweu

[2001-06-06 08:18:00] - vinnie: what is audiogalaxy? - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:18:00] - morpheus is gnutella with a better interface - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:17:00] - i hope they don't go after morpheus, that's my new napster. i guess i always have audiogalaxy as a backup - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:17:00] - katie: what is morpheus? - dewey

[2001-06-06 08:16:00] - http://entertainment.msn.com/news/eonline/060501_sony.asp why would anyone give a good review to "the animal"? :P - vinnie

[2001-06-06 08:15:00] - interesting... one of out local radio stations used to do live streaming, and i got this instead: http://y100.com/nostream.htm  - katie

[2001-06-06 08:08:00] - they've gone after napster and aimster... have they gone after morpheus yet? - katie

[2001-06-06 06:58:00] - yawn

[2001-06-06 00:40:00] - the kicker is that the big 5 aren't dropping the law suit. - mig

[2001-06-06 00:32:00] - ppl will go for this. - mig

[2001-06-06 00:32:00] - it's actually worse than what was originally thought.  they're actually going to have subscription levels.  according to them you're going to have to shell out approximately a price of one cd/month(which can be from $12-20).  I don't think very many

[2001-06-06 00:28:00] - http://www.sonicnet.com/news/story.jhtml?id=1444287 napster is now officially dead. - mig

[2001-06-06 00:25:00] - come on, men are mistreated, so are women, why do we have to fight about who is mistreated the most?  ~a

[2001-06-05 22:39:00] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20795-2001Jun4.html very scary. - mig

[2001-06-05 21:54:00] - a: A good point, except that we don't treat a man raping another man the same way as a man raping a woman in the US courts -paul

[2001-06-05 21:54:00] - http://www.reuters.com/news_company.jhtml?storyid=NEWS.REUT.20010604.N04180731rtr&ticker=ROXI.O no like, no like. - mig

[2001-06-05 20:31:00] - being in contact with people is too risky.  hell you can be  raped by/accused of raping  anything living.  so being in contact with anything living is too risky.  ~a

[2001-06-05 20:27:00] - the only real solution is to never have sex, and keep from being in a room with members of the opposite sex.  why stop there?  paul, aren't you affraid of males raping you?  aren't you afraid of males accusing you of raping them?!?  remember, "even if you are with a group of friends, then he can just claim attempted gang rape!"  ~a

[2001-06-05 19:45:00] - It's the whole gray area thing that i have an issue with. - mig

[2001-06-05 19:40:00] - matter what(even if the guy is also drunk and even if the guy can't tell if she's drunk or not). - mig

[2001-06-05 19:40:00] - i'm just wondering though, what are they using for their numbers of "commit rape".  Herein the problem is that there are many gray areas on the definition of what rape is.  As it stands now, as paul said, if a girl is drunk and has sex it is rape no

[2001-06-05 19:14:00] - thanks, pierce  ~a

[2001-06-05 18:54:00] - a: story on plannet's internet troubles: http://slashdot.org/articles/01/06/05/011212.shtml - boing

[2001-06-05 18:53:00] - http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/05/31/6419.html

[2001-06-05 18:50:00] - http://www.channel2000.com/news/stories/news-971111-211014.html

[2001-06-05 18:45:00] - rape and rape cultures are a side interest of mine - katie

[2001-06-05 18:43:00] - on a side note, the number of men who commit rape and are acquitted drastically outweigh the number of men who are falsely accused of rape. - katie

[2001-06-05 18:41:00] - i always miss the good arguments :( - katie

[2001-06-05 17:05:00] - aba: oaky, i'm going home too. cya everyone -dave

[2001-06-05 17:04:00] - granted, he could have written it better, but that's how i interpereted it. - mig

[2001-06-05 17:04:00] - mig: yeah, he is trying to show that the way the laws are, it's fairly easy for a women to wrongfully accuse a man and convict him -dave

[2001-06-05 17:04:00] - i'm gonna go get something to eat.  you'll be able to see my specific arguments with his entry later when i email him and he posts it.  bye dave.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 17:03:00] - there have been countless times when people have criticized christians on this board. whenever i say, i don't do that, everyone always says, well you're different. same thing with you and feminism -dave

[2001-06-05 17:03:00] - going back to the quote you mentioned, he merely states that it is possible for a female to claim that she is raped simply by being in a room alone with a guy.  he did not say that that's what all females do. - mig

[2001-06-05 17:02:00] - in order to talk about the issue, he has to say "women" and "men." -dave

[2001-06-05 17:01:00] - he is not accusing all females. the context of his article is refuting feministic statistics. he starts to talk about feministic rape cases. then he concludes that in fact, many times the male is accused wrongfully of rape but convicted anyways -dave

[2001-06-05 17:00:00] - no, he is accusing all females which includes me.  he doesn't have to be specific in this case.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:59:00] - but do you seriously think that he is accusing you, aparna, of going around plotting to set people up with rape charges? of course not -dave

[2001-06-05 16:58:00] - at least that's not how it came across to me. maybe you're a little more sensitive to it since you're female -dave

[2001-06-05 16:58:00] - aba: i beg to differ -dave

[2001-06-05 16:57:00] - no, that's what he intended to say.  that is not what he actually ended up saying.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:56:00] - he is not saying that all women are out to accuse you of rape. he's saying that in general, it's easier for a women to accuse men of rape and get away with it, even if it isn't true -dave

[2001-06-05 16:55:00] - i wouldn't say he has come across antagonistically at all -dave

[2001-06-05 16:55:00] - and i don't necessarily agree with everything he is saying. i just think he is doing a very good job of presenting the opposite viewpoint -dave

[2001-06-05 16:55:00] - how do you not see a problem with him generalizing to all women???  i am not out to accuse any of you of rape.  most females in fact are not like that.  so then why is it ok for him to say that we are??  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:54:00] - i don't think he pinpointed you in his last entry, did he? -dave

[2001-06-05 16:54:00] - in fact, i don't find a problem with generalizing about groups of people at all, as long as you keep an open mind when it comes to an individual person -dave

[2001-06-05 16:54:00] - yes, i know, and that is why i am having an open discussion about things.  i feel that he is wrong.  i am giving reasons why i feel he is wrong.  i felt he went overboard and actually was offensive to me in this last entry.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:53:00] - aba: i don't see a problem with him generalizing to all women. and i do think you generalize about men the same way -dave

[2001-06-05 16:52:00] - chances are because you agree with what he's saying.  :-p  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:52:00] - and he is very up front with the fact that everything he says is just his opinion and that you don't have to agree with it -dave

[2001-06-05 16:51:00] - dave, i've never made serious allegations as to the suspicious nature of males which is what paul is doing now.  whatever his intentions originally were, in his last article he generalized to all women which changes things altogher.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:51:00] - aba: i agree that sometimes paul could bea little more tactful or graceful about the way he says things, but overall, i thought his journal was fairly well written -dave

[2001-06-05 16:51:00] - http://aporter.dhs.org/?a=4&d=sentance :-) - aaron

[2001-06-05 16:50:00] - aba: even if his numbers vary just as widely, his point is just to say that you should not take all those feministic statistics for granted because there are others that say the opposite -dave

[2001-06-05 16:49:00] - we as in us people on the message board -dave

[2001-06-05 16:49:00] - actually if you look at his statistics page that he linked the numbers vary as wildly as the numbers he claims are not valid for suspected rapes.  they're not valid either (in my opinion as a statistician).  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:49:00] - aba: and you comment on men just as much as we comment on women. in fact, i think you went a little further since you specifically said that we weren't as accepting as you -dave

[2001-06-05 16:47:00] - oops, didn't mean current laws, but current mentality. anyway, i really have to go now - vinnie

[2001-06-05 16:47:00] - aba: i thought he was just saying that in proportion to the number of rape cases, there are a surprising number that aren't true -dave

[2001-06-05 16:47:00] - i know what his intent is because i have discussed it with him, but that is not what it appears like he is saying.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:47:00] - aba: i don't think he was implying that at all -dave

[2001-06-05 16:46:00] - in fact, not only overgeneralizing (because I think the overwhelming majority would not accuse wrongfully of rape), but merely making the point that under current laws, it could happen - vinnie

[2001-06-05 16:45:00] - i know that last sentance was kind of confusing, but do you get what i mean. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:45:00] - and you haven't.  my take on this whole thing is that the issue of rape has been overly-exagerrated by the extremists.  however, i do think that paul has overexagerated that exageration. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:44:00] - aba: paul is overgeneralizing. i think most of my female friends have good enough judgement to not wrongfully accuse someone of rape - vinnie

[2001-06-05 16:44:00] - how in the world is that quote supposed to make me feel about being friends with so many guys??  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:43:00] - "Don't think that abstinence is enough, though. Simply being alone in a room with a female is more then enough for her to claim rape or attempted rape (hell, even if you are with a group of friends, then she can just claim attempted gang rape)."

[2001-06-05 16:42:00] - but up until those final paragraphs, I agreed with most of what he said. anyway, gotta go home - vinnie

[2001-06-05 16:42:00] - it makes me rethink the way i behave around all of you.  i have told raunchy jokes, etc, but i don't believe i have ever acted out in such a way that it could be construed that i would wrongfully sue you of rape.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:41:00] - as it is, it's pretty offensive to read that he thinks it's unsafe to be in a room with a woman because they all just want to pretend that they've been raped.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:40:00] - it's one thing to attack people like gloria steinhem or the leaders of now, but it's another thing to generalize to feminists and women as a whole.  if he wants to say such things he needs to be more specific.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:39:00] - i do also admit that paul probably went a little too far in overgeneralizing as well. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:37:00] - that is true, aparna. paul cleverly starts with bashing feminists, then switches over to generalizing that to women who declare rape, then women in general. i didn't even notice it - vinnie

[2001-06-05 16:37:00] - ement. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:37:00] - but as paul said, like it or not, the extremists that paul mentions and ones he says he despises are the ones that have the big voice.  they are the ones representing the mov

[2001-06-05 16:34:00] - you guys seem to envision this huge evil feminist beast out there, when really at the bottom of it it's just people like me.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:33:00] - and you know, i do call myself a feminist.  go me for alienating my friends.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:29:00] - not really.  if you read paul's latest entry, it pretty much states that all women are out to get you charged with raping them.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:28:00] - Hey Vinnie, did you want to come over today? I got my gamepad working, and I also wanted to show you "Mario Wrecking Crew '98", it's really fun! - aaron

[2001-06-05 16:27:00] - at least i'm not anti-woman. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:26:00] - unforutnately you seem to be misrespresneting us.  we are anti-feminists but not anti-women.  there is a difference. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:25:00] - bye paul.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:24:00] - heh, except i'm not anti-man.  i seem to be a lot more accepting than you all are . . .    -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:24:00] - i'll give you an example of how the few can influence the many.  i seem to remember during the elction last year, jesse jackson came down to florida and cause a huge ruckus, almost to the point of rioting, by accusing the voting system of 'racism'.

[2001-06-05 16:23:00] - Anyway, I need to go home now. Talk to you all later! -paul

[2001-06-05 16:23:00] - aba: I think you should so an anti-man week in your journal, I would be interested in reading it to see what you have to say -paul

[2001-06-05 16:22:00] - oh well, whatever.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:22:00] - mig: The entire democratic party is in the pocket of NOW for instance.... -paul

[2001-06-05 16:21:00] - if i started an anti-man week in my blog, you people would be jumping at my throat because of how misrepresented you'd feel.  :-\  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:20:00] - yes, but the problem is that these quotes are from prominent people.  people tend to listen to these people becuase of that.  - mig

[2001-06-05 16:19:00] - aba: Like it or not, though, those people are the voice of the modern feminist movement -paul

[2001-06-05 16:15:00] - bleh.  i really disagree with taking the quotes of the few to represent the many.  i could take the man show as my representation of males, and i'd be totally wrong.  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:13:00] - quiet you. -mig

[2001-06-05 16:10:00] - mig: Is disturbingness a word? -paul

[2001-06-05 16:10:00] - dave: Sorry, but it's so easy to do :-D -paul

[2001-06-05 16:09:00] - aba:  the disturbingness of the other quotes on that page more than makes up for that qutoes non-disturbingness. - mig

[2001-06-05 16:08:00] - oh, =P stop confusing me -dave

[2001-06-05 16:08:00] - dave: Or at least I implied as much in my journal entry -paul

[2001-06-05 16:08:00] - aba: Stupid game crashed AIM express again :-( -paul

[2001-06-05 16:06:00] - dave: I said there was something wrong with it -paul

[2001-06-05 16:06:00] - http://www.titoonic.dk/testarea/spider/  cute game  -  aba

[2001-06-05 16:05:00] - did the article say there was something wrong with it? -dave

[2001-06-05 16:04:00] - paul: then why was she asking what we thought was wrong with it? -dave

[2001-06-05 16:01:00] - dave: I imagine she does agree with that quote, at least I don't see why she wouldn't -paul

[2001-06-05 15:59:00] - paul: oh, i didn't know whether aparna agreed with what she said or not = ) -dave

[2001-06-05 15:55:00] - dave: Well, I guess that's one way of looking at it, but I think the point was that she was an evil athiest :-) -paul

[2001-06-05 15:54:00] - but she didn't say when the article was published, so i can't say for sure -dave

[2001-06-05 15:53:00] - paul: i was doing no such thing, i was trying to point out what i thought might be wrong with the quote. -dave

[2001-06-05 15:52:00] - Ouch! Dave laying the religious smackdown on Steinem's heretical behind! -paul

[2001-06-05 15:50:00] - aba: well apparently she failed since it's already 2001 -dave

[2001-06-05 15:48:00] - Yay! The board is back up! -paul

[2001-06-05 14:09:00] - me is more to about 50% i think. - mig

[2001-06-05 14:06:00] - "By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God." (Gloria Steinhem, editor of 'MS' magazine.)    what's so wrong with this quote?  -  aba

[2001-06-05 14:06:00] - vinnie: Btw, can I use your email in my journal? -paul

[2001-06-05 14:05:00] - vinnie: I imagine I am probably very close to agreeing with the objectivists 100%, I would say around 95% or so -paul

[2001-06-05 14:00:00] - although i don't think i'd ever become an objectivist (they all seem crazy :P), i think i unwittingly am close to one - vinnie

[2001-06-05 14:00:00] - vinnie: Yeah, there are still some parts of objectivism I don't understand either, I wonder if there is a class at Tech which teaches it... -paul

[2001-06-05 13:58:00] - aaron: My computer doesn't have a working burner and my parent's computer doesn't have a zip drive, sorry :-( -paul

[2001-06-05 13:58:00] - that would be my point exactly.  what better way to beat destroy the "system" by beating the system at its own game. - mig

[2001-06-05 13:56:00] - i can't really see why objectivists wouldn't vote though. even if it is "approving of the system", they can easily use their vote to destroy parts of that very system. libertarians are doing essentially the same thing - vinnie

[2001-06-05 13:56:00] - vinnie: Yeah, I've been reading a bunch about all sorts of political theories and philosophies and objectivism is one of the most interesting of them... -paul

[2001-06-05 13:53:00] - in fact, i don't disagree with any of objectivism's fundamental points listed on that website - vinnie

[2001-06-05 13:53:00] - Can anybody burn me an audio CD, comprised of MP3 and WAV files, which I would put on a Zip Disk.... and I could get it by friday, so I can listen to it on the way to Kings Dominion? - aaron

[2001-06-05 13:53:00] - that site puts objectivism in a much better light than the club did - vinnie

[2001-06-05 13:50:00] - mig: I dunno, it's an interesting way of looking at it. I can see why objectivists wouldn't vote then -paul

[2001-06-05 13:46:00] - oh i get it.  well yeah. - mig

[2001-06-05 13:45:00] - if you vote you may not necessarily the current government, however.  you may vote in order to change it.  not sure of what you meant by "approve of the government." - mig

[2001-06-05 13:45:00] - mig: No, I mean, voting in an election says that you approve of the way our government works and accept it -paul

[2001-06-05 13:43:00] - approve of the concept of government?  - mig

[2001-06-05 13:42:00] - though i do agree that objectvisism walks almost hand in hand with libretarianism. - mig

[2001-06-05 13:42:00] - mig: I thought the entire part about whether or not people should vote was interesting, because voting does kind of signify that you approve of the government -paul

[2001-06-05 13:41:00] - dewey: Episode 1 was either "the cage" or "the menegerie" -paul

[2001-06-05 13:36:00] - still doesn't endear me to objectivism.  i still disagree with some major points(mainly the anti-environmental ones). - mig

[2001-06-05 13:36:00] - Paul: was episode 1 the first movie? - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:31:00] - dewey: Oh, I thought you were talking about the movies..... -paul

[2001-06-05 13:30:00] - mig: It is written by an (objectivist?) libertarian and he is talking about how you can be both... -paul

[2001-06-05 13:29:00] - mig: Thanks. Check out this link http://www.vix.com/pub/objectivism/Writing/PeterSaintAndre/Libertarian.html -paul

[2001-06-05 13:28:00] - Paul: Ahh!  To buy all 30 dvds from Amazon.com, it would cost $491.70! :-o - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:28:00] - Paul: so when it says "episode 2" it means the newest episode? - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:28:00] - vinnie: Did you ever read that pamphlet called "If men have all the power then why do women make all the rules?" ? -paul

[2001-06-05 13:26:00] - i mean, yes, you may, paul. - mig

[2001-06-05 13:26:00] - yes, you may. - mig

[2001-06-05 13:26:00] - vinnie: I don't think so. Think about what would happen if a husband wanted to divorce his wife and they had some children. People would say he is a cold-hearted bastard who is abandoning his family -paul

[2001-06-05 13:22:00] - dewey: Because they are releasing them in descending order, they started with the last movie and are going backwards -paul

[2001-06-05 13:21:00] - it isn't socially acceptable for men to initiate divorce? - vinnie

[2001-06-05 13:17:00] - dewey: Suck what? :-P -paul

[2001-06-05 13:17:00] - paul: How come TOS episode 1 isn't on their dvds? http://homevideo.paramount.com/dvd_frame.html -dewey

[2001-06-05 13:16:00] - paul: I always thought it was interesting how much women suck - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:13:00] - dewey: I always thought it was interesting that it is socially acceptable for women to initiate a divorce but not for a man to do so -paul

[2001-06-05 13:13:00] - heh, on Amazon.com the list price is 19.99 but their strike-through font makes it look like $10.00 (wheras their list price is 14.99) :) - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:10:00] - Women can easily get swept up by small emotional flings that mean nothing and ruin a good relationship based on those. Men are more sturdy emotionally. - dewey

[2001-06-05 13:07:00] - dewey: Good point. I read somewhere that men actually tend to invest more emotionally into a marriage whereas women tend to see it more as a financial stability thing -paul

[2001-06-05 13:04:00] - dewey: They have been releasing them fairly regularly, I think one and month or something. I think it is around $10-15 a piece, not sure though -paul

[2001-06-05 13:03:00] - dave: I'm not sure if I entirely agree with you, men tend to be more aggressive when it comes to pursuing sex and women are more responsible because they have more responsibility I think -paul

[2001-06-05 13:01:00] - Dave: but women initiate 75% of divorces (according to Paul's sources).  So doesn't that mean they sleep around or are more anxious to try a new guy out? - dewey

[2001-06-05 12:59:00] - paul: not regularly. How many DVDs did it take?  And how much a piece?- dewey

[2001-06-05 12:59:00] - as far as sexual responsibility goes, i think the females are a little ahead of the guys -dave

[2001-06-05 12:58:00] - paul: females may have a lot of power in sexual relationships, but guys are the ones who (gross generalization here) sleep around, get people pregnant, drop them, and move on -dave

[2001-06-05 12:55:00] - mig: Can I use your email in my journal? -paul

[2001-06-05 12:53:00] - http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/05/0239211&mode=thread woo, down with sdmi! - mig

[2001-06-05 12:53:00] - dewey: Do you watch Boston Public? -paul

[2001-06-05 12:52:00] - dewey: They released the original series in DVDs with 2 episodes on each DVD -paul

[2001-06-05 12:51:00] - and they are mailing us back refund?! - dewey

[2001-06-05 12:50:00] - Current National Debt: 06/04/2001 $5,668,781,838,668.70  http://www.savingsbonds.gov/opd/opdpenny.htm  - dewey

[2001-06-05 12:49:00] - I would probably pay quite a bit for it too, but I would buy the Voyager and DS9 series.  And "ER". -dewey

[2001-06-05 12:48:00] - boo on box sets.  I want the whole damn series laid out in chronological order. - dewey

[2001-06-05 12:26:00] - "the studio is planning to start releasing episodes of...Deep Space Nine...by the end of the year...Look for boxed sets of full seasons at a time, similar to what Fox has done with The X-Files" Hurray! :-D -paul

[2001-06-05 12:10:00] - dewey: Adrian posted a link to his old message board awhile back -paul

[2001-06-05 12:09:00] - dave: Agreed, but I think that the way things are laid out, the females have far too much power in sexual relationships in America today -paul

[2001-06-05 12:06:00] - a: I was thanking you for last night ;-) -paul

[2001-06-05 11:41:00] - a: he was sarcastically thanking you for posting that old message board message -dave

[2001-06-05 11:41:00] - but on the other hand. i think the reason that it's so hard to disprove rape is that it is hard to prove it as well. so which side do you errr on? (shrug) -dave

[2001-06-05 11:40:00] - paul:  "thank you adrian -paul"  huh?!  ~a

[2001-06-05 11:31:00] - paul: good point in your journal about falsely accused guys. they should be able to sue the female...in any other legal instance you could -dave

[2001-06-05 11:19:00] - And do you ever delete the messages?  Someone suggested archiving, and that would be cool. - dewey

[2001-06-05 11:18:00] - what is this about an 'old' message board? - dewey

[2001-06-05 11:18:00] - what is this about an 'old' message board?

[2001-06-05 11:16:00] - great. we leave the airport tonight at 3am (11pm EST). i should be home by around 6pm EST tomorrow! :-P -jdb

[2001-06-05 11:14:00] - jdb: How was your trip? -paul

[2001-06-05 11:09:00] - yay, i head back home tonight! :-D -jdb

[2001-06-05 10:44:00] - http://www.mises.org/fullarticle.asp?control=692&month=32&title=Feminists+for+Taxes&id=33

[2001-06-05 10:37:00] - http://www.vonmises.org/fullstory.asp?control=693&FS=How+Not+to+Raise+Wages

[2001-06-05 09:25:00] - New journal entry up for those who want to read it -paul

[2001-06-05 09:24:00] - dave: I should show you the article in my PCGamer, it's funny, they make it sound like computer game porn is the only computer games over there -paul

[2001-06-05 09:18:00] - paul: they really have virtual sex computer games? but yeah, if anyone had them, the japs sure would -dave

[2001-06-05 09:00:00] - dave: And the Japanese are too busy spending their money on their virtual sex computer games (I want to live in Japan) -paul

[2001-06-05 08:51:00] - hehe, that's because they only need to buy a single copy in china for everyone to have the game = ) lol -dave

[2001-06-05 08:38:00] - dave: I think I read somewhere that half of non-US Starcraft sales were in Korea alone -paul

[2001-06-05 08:36:00] - oops, i meant mmorpg -dave

[2001-06-05 08:35:00] - interesting article on the world's most popular mmorp....and it's in south korea... http://www.time.com/time/interactive/entertainment/gangs_np.html -dave

[2001-06-05 08:32:00] - Ah ha! Look at Deep Space Nine! Most people say it never jumped the shark -paul

[2001-06-05 08:30:00] - most people think flintstones jumped the shark when they added kazoo :) - vinnie

[2001-06-05 08:29:00] - the site name is a reference to the happy days episode when fonz jumps a shark - vinnie

[2001-06-05 08:27:00] - when did your favorite tv shows jump the shark? http://www.jumptheshark.com/ - vinnie

[2001-06-05 08:23:00] - paul: that's what you get for antagonizing the owner of the message board, lol -dave

[2001-06-05 08:19:00] - Thank you Adrian -paul

[2001-06-05 00:21:00] - http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2001/06/05/mom_rage/  interesting article on working moms.  -  aba

[2001-06-04 23:44:00] - http://aporter.dhs.org/?a=4&d=paul+gay

[2001-06-04 22:27:00] - a: Yes, well. They weren't doing it until you posted the link to the old message board -paul

[2001-06-04 21:53:00] - they could do that on the new message board even easier with a semi functional search engine.  ~a

[2001-06-04 21:22:00] - a: I am worried that people will dig up dirt about me from the old messages -paul

[2001-06-04 18:20:00] - aaron: it is the old message board before the summer ended.  ~a

[2001-06-04 18:17:00] - paul: the old message board is a subset of the new message board.  only the message numbers are different.  what are you worried about?  ~a

[2001-06-04 16:52:00] - was brazil that odd movie with "information retrieval" and all that? -dave

[2001-06-04 16:34:00] - incidentally, i thought the movie was pretty cool, though i don't think i took it all in. i need to rewatch it - vinnie

[2001-06-04 16:33:00] - you think brazil is awesome, aba?! it's a strange, strange day when you and andrew agree on something ;) - vinnie

[2001-06-04 16:23:00] - ugh, those new detanator drivers really fucked up my computer.  it completely messed with anything that used directx - mig

[2001-06-04 16:18:00] - i read the book 12 monnkeys and i thought it was messed up -dave

prev <-> next