prev <-> next
[2001-01-30 14:46:00] - what's wrong with chugging windex? -Dave
[2001-01-30 14:38:00] - I think it's the networks, but I honestly don't know. -Paul
[2001-01-30 14:31:00] - who rates the shows? - aba
[2001-01-30 14:22:00] - http://www.howstuffworks.com/question167.htm -Paul
[2001-01-30 12:41:00] - or does the parent simply set what programs to ignore? - aba
[2001-01-30 12:35:00] - sorry for my ignorance, but how exactly does the v-chip work? does it work by ratings or something? - aba
[2001-01-30 11:51:00] - Should we ban those products because they could be harmful to children when they are left alone in the house? -Paul
[2001-01-30 11:50:00] - There are a lot of worse things that kids can do if left home alone then to watch "objectionable" tv programs. What if they get ahold of a kitchen knife? Or start chugging Windex? -Paul
[2001-01-30 11:40:00] - take care of my brothers and me. -asg
[2001-01-30 11:40:00] - I agree that parents usually have the means to control what their kids watch. When I was in elementary school and middle school my parents both worked full-time, so they had my grandparents (who lived in the same county) or a babysitter -asg
[2001-01-30 10:53:00] - If I want my kid to grow up to be a perverted, sex-crazed, misogynistic maniac, then I will show him porn when he is little. If I want him to be a christian, I will force-feed him Billy Graham all day long. -Paul
[2001-01-30 10:50:00] - responsibility for raising their kid. That's not right. If parents want their kid raised a certain way, it's their responsibility to see that it is done, not the government's -Paul
[2001-01-30 10:49:00] - The problem is that most parents these days don't realize what a tremendous responsibility having a kid is. Instead of having a parent stay home to take care of the kid, they would rather continue their career and let the government take -Paul
[2001-01-30 10:47:00] - If the v-chip isn't used, whose problem is that? Also, if the parents don't trust their kid when it comes to watching TV, that's what babysitters are for. -Paul
[2001-01-30 02:52:00] - it - mig
[2001-01-30 02:52:00] - and if their parents raised em right, they'll know what to do. and then sometimes kids make mistakes no matter how much you try to help them. it happens. some kids doing stupid things no matter what. and whatever is on tv has nothing to do with
[2001-01-30 02:25:00] - parents need to raise their kids . . . i think parents who talk to their kids about shit have a higher chance of keeping their kids out of trouble; but you can't be there all the time ~a
[2001-01-30 02:24:00] - how about those who are in 4th grade? and what about those young impressionable kids who are curious for more than 5 seconds? ~a
[2001-01-30 02:21:00] - 5th grade: 11 years old . . . and in 5th grade were you taught about pornography and how it can fuck you up? ~a
[2001-01-30 02:04:00] - a kid accidently watching a stripper isn't going to fuck him/her up. at worst they'll probably be curious for 5 seconds and then move on to something else. - mig
[2001-01-30 02:00:00] - i had sex-ed when i was about 10 or 11 i think. what about you guys? - mig
[2001-01-30 01:59:00] - Because parents don't seem to talk to kids any more, and they allow tv or their peers to raise them, that's why we have fucked up kids that don't know right from wrong. - mig
[2001-01-30 01:57:00] - think it's "cool".
[2001-01-30 01:57:00] - and? i fail to see why it's so important that we keep children in this air-tight bubble from reality. That's why schools have sex-ed classes, and that's why parents talk to their kids about sex. That way when they see the strippers, they don't
[2001-01-30 01:43:00] - that means you need a way to keep children from watching strippers on vh1 . . . and we have already discussed the fact that parents are not and can not always be there ~a
[2001-01-30 01:24:00] - the only problem is it probably isn't used ~a
[2001-01-30 01:24:00] - i think the 'much-hyped and forced-down-our-throats v-chip' would work if it was used . . . that would prevent children for seeing things their parents would not want them to see when they are not around (at work) ~a
[2001-01-30 01:11:00] - young kids having sex is not tv's fault. that's the result of bad parenting. - mig
[2001-01-30 00:53:00] - when kids the age of 14 are getting pregnant, how can you say that the govt doesn't have any right regulating sex on tv? - aba
[2001-01-29 22:17:00] - I just think that it is always better to just not watch stuff you don't want to see rather then ruin it for others by getting it censored -Paul
[2001-01-29 22:07:00] - Whoa... nice timing Andrew
-Paul[2001-01-29 22:07:00] - I feel that it is fine for the stations themselves to censor what they show, I just don't feel that the government censor anything -Paul
[2001-01-29 22:06:00] - not censor atheism. What I think is wrong is for the government or anyone else to say all channels can't show certian content. -asg
[2001-01-29 22:05:00] - A Christian channel probably would censor any advocation of atheism. However, I think that is fine as long as there are plenty of channels that don
[2001-01-29 22:03:00] - I think I agree with paul in that atheism would be just as offensive to some people as nudity. -asg
[2001-01-29 21:48:00] - That was in response to Andrew's question about a channel in which Atheism is supported for atheists and a channel where it is banned for theists -paul
[2001-01-29 21:47:00] - There will never be a channel that will not contain objectionable content to someone... people just have to learn to tolerate or change the channel -paul
[2001-01-29 21:27:00] - As for parents who leave their kids at home, isn't that what the much-hyped and forced-down-our-throats V-chip is for? -Paul
[2001-01-29 21:26:00] - And I concede the point to Andrew that my comparison to segregation was faulty, I was just trying to point out that what the majority considers to be right is not always good -Paul
[2001-01-29 21:24:00] - Objection to stripping is also a belief and many people believe that atheism leads to moral decay... I fail to see why stripping is any better or worse -paul
[2001-01-29 21:22:00] - The point I am making is that if we censor nudity because it is offensive, then what is stopping people from censoring atheism because it is offensive? -Paul
[2001-01-29 20:26:00] - mtv should not 'show only music that is just for kids' . . . they should show music videos that are not obscene to the point society decides they are too much ~a
[2001-01-29 18:05:00] - besides, vh1 and mtv are music channels. they show(at least they used to) play all kinds of music. Are you saying the mtv should show only music that is just for kids?
[2001-01-29 17:47:00] - there isn't that much bsb, or britney on vh1 either
[2001-01-29 17:47:00] - actually, mtv doesn't show the madonna video that much, vh1 does, but i don't know many 12-14 years olds that are into any of the stuff on vh1. - mig
[2001-01-29 17:34:00] - and, paul, atheism is a belief while stripping simply objectifies women and places a huge emphasis on sex. i hate to say it, but morality plays a big part in this whole thing. - aba
[2001-01-29 17:32:00] - yes, but by your standards the channels should show whatever they want. are you saying that parents should block all channels? a lot of young kids watch mtv and vh1 now because of bsb, nsync and britney spears. - aba
[2001-01-29 17:06:00] - and if parents are really that concerned about it, they can block channels they don't want their kids to see. - mig
[2001-01-29 17:04:00] - of course, that was mainly due to my catholic upbringing. - mig
[2001-01-29 17:02:00] - and what would that have done exactly? When I was a kid my first reaction to scantily clad women, was "Ewwwww...." and i would flip the channel. - mig
[2001-01-29 16:56:00] - but at the same time, you could have accidentally been surfing and stopped apon vh1 or something else with stripping ~a
[2001-01-29 16:53:00] - yes, but i don't think i was actively looking for channels that my parents didn't want to see. my first instinct was to flip to disney or nickelodeon, or i'd just turn on the NES, when i was a little kid, i don't know about you. - mig
[2001-01-29 16:42:00] - by the way, i increased the character limit ~a
[2001-01-29 16:41:00] - it happens all of the time when you have two parents at work and a kid who gets home from school around 2:00. don't tell me you were never home alone when you were you were young. ~a
[2001-01-29 16:41:00] - what the fuck are they supposed to do when their kids are home alone? ~a
[2001-01-29 16:21:00] - no one has the right to make it their crusade to make sure everything on TV conforms to their "better" standards.
[2001-01-29 16:18:00] - ones making sure their kids aren't watching it, not the government.
[2001-01-29 16:17:00] - screw the majority. if they don't like what's on tv, they can change the channel. if they don't want their kids watching it, then they should be the
[2001-01-29 16:05:00] - anyone here about that new law they passed in virginia. it will soon be illegal to sleep in any other room in your house other than a bedroom. - mig
[2001-01-29 16:01:00] - If they have a choice in which channels to watch, then they should watch channels that don't offend them. - mig
[2001-01-29 15:44:00] - channels to watch. -asg (Andrew Goodman, in case anyone is wondering who I am)
[2001-01-29 15:43:00] - I think your comparison to segragation isn't very fitting since people didn't have a choice about segragation, but they have a choice of which
[2001-01-29 15:42:00] - where atheism is supported? that way people could watch (and have their children watch) whichever channels support their views.
[2001-01-29 15:41:00] - But what about the people who think atheism is wrong? Shouldn't there be some channels that they know will never advocate atheism, and other channels
[2001-01-29 11:31:00] - Should Atheists be banned from expressing their views except for on the Atheist channel? -Paul
[2001-01-29 11:27:00] - I read somewhere that the many of Americans think that Atheism is obscene and Atheists shouldn't be given free speech -Paul
[2001-01-29 11:24:00] - So segragation in the South was acceptable because the majority of the people in the South wanted it? -Paul
[2001-01-29 10:11:00] - something like the playboy channel. as it is, cable is a pay-for service . . . the madonna video wouldn't make it on network tv. - aba
[2001-01-29 10:10:00] - express purpose of speaking up for the people who they represent. if the majority of the people think it is obscene, then it gets censored to . . . .
[2001-01-29 10:09:00] - there is far from a "1% chance" of kids seeing that music video. a lot of kids watch mtv. elected officials are put in their offices for the . . . .
[2001-01-28 23:33:00] - That way parents and people who do think censorship is a good thing can know there children won't see anything they consider inappropriate. -ASG
[2001-01-28 23:31:00] - are considered obscene or offensive by a large part of the population.
[2001-01-28 23:30:00] - While I personally think there is not much need for censorship, I think things that things that are aimed at children should not show things that
[2001-01-28 12:31:00] - d hence we must all live our lives in his "better" way. - Xpovos
[2001-01-28 12:30:00] - I'll make a quick comment on this; I just think it's increadibly arrogant for anyone, esp. an elected official to decide that something is obscene, an
[2001-01-28 03:23:00] - and the minority has no right to violate the civil rights of the majority, and vice versa. - mig
[2001-01-28 03:21:00] - obsencity is just as opinionated as finding something offensive. like i said, it's a loophole to get around the 1st amendment. - mig
[2001-01-28 03:16:00] - You have a sex show on Disney, there's something wrong with that. There's nothing wrong with the madonna video on VH1. - mig
[2001-01-28 03:16:00] - What about what the minority thinks is obscene? Isn't the purpose of government t protect the rights of the minority? -Paul
[2001-01-28 03:15:00] - I just want to know how we are suppose to measure what is obscene... Is it what the majority thinks is obscene? -Paul
[2001-01-28 03:12:00] - anything - mig
[2001-01-28 03:12:00] - while i agree there is stuff kids should not see, just because there is a 1% chance of young kids seeing it is not a valid reason to censor
[2001-01-28 03:10:00] - it just doesn't hold any meaning to me anymore. - mig
[2001-01-28 03:10:00] - i don't mean to come down on you aparna, but I don't see any validity in the "protecting the children" argument. I've seen it used so many times that
[2001-01-28 02:59:00] - around the first amendment. - mig
[2001-01-28 02:59:00] - Actually, people censor things that are "obscene", because that word was the loophole created by judges so that they would have an excuse to get
[2001-01-28 00:28:00] - And that's why we censor stuff, right? Because people find it offensive? -Paul
[2001-01-28 00:27:00] - I'm not saying a woman's face should be censored because it is sexual. I am saying it should be censored because some people find it offensive -paul
[2001-01-27 23:04:00] - i disagree with everything miguel says EVER
[2001-01-27 22:58:00] - hope you guys are having a fun weekend!
- aba[2001-01-27 22:57:00] - ...toned down than the rest of her "curves". - aba
[2001-01-27 22:57:00] - i think i'll adjust what i said about the woman's face to saying that while there is something sexual about red lips or wide eyes, it is a lot more...
[2001-01-27 22:55:00] - granted a lot of adults don't understand sex any better than kids do, young kids really aren't ready to learn about that. - aba
[2001-01-27 22:55:00] - there is nothing sexual about a woman's face, while there is a lot that is sexual about a woman's breasts or butt. - aba
[2001-01-27 00:54:00] - When you ask me to justify showing nudity where kids may see it, I challenge you to justify showing women's faces where kids may see it -Paul
[2001-01-27 00:51:00] - Who's to say that showing young kids nudity is wrong? In many Islamic countries, women aren't suppose to show their faces. Is that right? -Paul
[2001-01-26 23:23:00] - so why should they block content that no one who watches the channel would object to. - miguel
[2001-01-26 23:22:00] - The large majority of vh1/mtv viewers don't really care about what's on the channel
[2001-01-26 23:21:00] - so, what would 14 years olds be doing watching Vh1 anyway - mig
[2001-01-26 19:19:00] - anyway, off to UVA i go. we shall continue this when i return!
- aba[2001-01-26 19:18:00] - nudity isn't evil and neither is sexuality, but i still don't see how you can justify young kids seeing stuff like that. - aba
[2001-01-26 19:17:00] - the video has something very close to nudity. it's more than i think most kids under the age of say 14 should see. - aba
[2001-01-26 19:13:00] - penis pie? -Paul
[2001-01-26 17:55:00] - PENIS PIE
[2001-01-26 01:12:00] - the only reason the recommendation of garment-donning should be made is if someone looks cold. m
[2001-01-26 01:11:00] - people are _born_ naked. thus, if you want to take a rational viewpoint, nudity cant be inherently evil. m
[2001-01-26 01:08:00] - puritans fathered the seemingly invincible beast of censorship; unchanged are both the ridiculous foundation and the relentless persistence thereof. M
[2001-01-25 10:50:00] - :-0
[2001-01-25 10:15:00] -
[2001-01-25 10:15:00] - i think we need more from the other side . . . aparna? ~a
[2001-01-25 08:16:00] - society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable." - quote from some justice in some court case. - mig
[2001-01-25 08:15:00] - "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because
[2001-01-25 08:10:00] - if they had nudity, you might have a point. but there is no nudity in the video - mig
[2001-01-25 08:10:00] - Are you equating the madonna video to porn? I don't think that's a fair comparison. - mig
[2001-01-25 01:03:00] - them from MTV? If someone wants to watch them, then they can visit TNN (they've got pop, ya know) -paul
[2001-01-25 01:02:00] - Madonna has just as much right to show her videos on MTV as N'Sync does. Hell, I'm sure Miguel finds the N'Sync music video offensive. Why not ban
[2001-01-25 01:01:00] - where it will be seen by fewer people? -Paul
[2001-01-25 01:00:00] - I imagine the playboy channel doesn't have nearly as many viewers as MTV does. Therefore, why would someone want to put their music video on a station
[2001-01-25 00:45:00] - i think people going to the playboy channel aren't looking for strippers . . . they are usually looking for more than that ~a
[2001-01-24 23:42:00] - anyone can get cable, but only adults can order porn channels. that's the way things should be for now. societal mores are not that lax. - aba
[2001-01-24 23:41:00] - no, but there's no point in putting something that offensive on mtv. if someone wants to watch strippers then there's the playboy channel. - aba
[2001-01-24 18:09:00] - something they wouldn't want to see. - mig
[2001-01-24 18:08:00] - as for the general populace, they can change the channel if they don't like what they see. no one's holding a gun to their head making them watching
[2001-01-24 17:57:00] - actually, they're all pretty spineless right now. - miguel
[2001-01-24 17:57:00] - politicians - miguel
[2001-01-24 17:57:00] - actually i'm pretty sure it isn't the majority that are pushing for these "decency" laws. They are pressured in by religious freaks and spineless
[2001-01-24 01:08:00] - It's fine to find things objectionable, the problem arises when you try to force your beliefs on others. -Paul
[2001-01-23 22:18:00] - Doh!
-Paul[2001-01-23 22:18:00] - Er.... I mean decency lawas...
-Paul[2001-01-23 22:15:00] - Decency laws are censorship, pure and simple. And if there is one thing I can say I despise, it is censorship. -Paul
[2001-01-23 21:58:00] - decency lawas are set not by the extremes of society but by the majority. granted, there are some weird cases. - aba
[2001-01-23 21:58:00] - the point isn't whether or not i want to watch them but whether or not the general populace of the country does - aba
[2001-01-23 20:36:00] - And if you don't want to watch them on cable TV.... well then don't. Change the channel. -Paul
[2001-01-23 20:33:00] - strippers offensive, but find them sexy as well. -Paul
[2001-01-23 20:32:00] - Madonna has good music. Only weirdos use the angry face. And I am sure that there are plenty of males out there that not only don't find female
[2001-01-23 15:36:00] - not just female strippers . . . in some cases porn stars ~a
[2001-01-23 14:07:00] - stuffing money into the g-strings of female strippers isn't really something that belongs on regular cable tv - aba
[2001-01-23 14:07:00] - the angry face is the coolest, you are lucky ~a
[2001-01-23 14:06:00] - paul, what about "music" by madonna ~a
[2001-01-23 11:59:00] - As for the topic of conversation: Nothing is objectionable in music videos! -Paul
[2001-01-23 11:58:00] - Don't feel bad Pierce, I am the angry face -Paul
[2001-01-23 07:23:00] - they were arbitrary ~a
[2001-01-23 03:18:00] - why am I the frowny face?!?! - Pierce
[2001-01-23 00:57:00] - @@@/movies.txt @@@/movies2.txt
[2001-01-22 22:36:00] - what is objectionable and what is sexy in music videos? -vh1
[2001-01-22 22:35:00] - so what is the topic of conversation? ~a
[2001-01-22 20:31:00] - I'll use it too, now that it's up again! --Xpovos
[2001-01-22 19:41:00] - i love adrian michael porter
[2001-01-22 11:14:00] - Me being Paul -Paul
[2001-01-22 11:13:00] - Yay! Somebody besides me posted something to this board!
[2001-01-21 21:26:00] -
[2001-01-21 02:07:00] - Why is nobody using this message board? Must I write something inflammatory to provoke a response? -Paul
[2001-01-19 07:36:00] - with Paul
[2001-01-19 07:35:00] - RSVP for Bush
[2001-01-18 11:32:00] - http://aporter.dhs.org/pics/pics.html
[2001-01-17 23:42:00] - boo bush
[2001-01-17 20:49:00] - Come celebrate Bush's inauguration at P&Ts this Saturday! Protesters welcome! Bring your own placards! -Paul
[2001-01-15 21:29:00] - Hurray for message board!
[2000-12-18 15:29:00] - paul!
[2000-12-18 14:40:00] - why does the link to my web-page have an angry face next to it? -Paul
[2000-12-18 12:32:00] - see ya all
[2000-12-18 12:32:00] - you can kill me later when I get my life together
[2000-12-18 12:32:00] - Dewey I still owe you...you know what it is ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
[2000-12-18 12:30:00] - AIM- nhanhh ICQ- 8371508 Phone-540-951-6173 email-nhuynh@vt.edu
[2000-12-18 12:30:00] - feel like it give me a call and come over.
[2000-12-18 12:29:00] - and I owe you guys all those times at paul and travis' place so whenever
[2000-12-18 12:28:00] - hey I move into a new apartment that people can hang out and get drunk at.
[2000-12-18 12:27:00] - just checking to see how everybody is doing...
[2000-12-18 12:27:00] - just checking to see how everybody is doing...
[2000-12-18 12:21:00] - hi everybody this is nhan happy holidays
[2000-12-18 00:22:00] - Lauren Kilduff is a cutie
[2000-12-18 00:21:00] - I want my T1 connection!
[2000-12-17 23:53:00] - mr fish!
[2000-12-17 17:36:00] - who is the hottest person alive? ~a
[2000-12-17 03:06:00] - sleepy -_-
[2000-12-17 03:06:00] - today is sunday, the seventeenth day of december. it is three o five am est.
[2000-12-17 00:42:00] - ugh. 56k is soooooo much slower than i remembered.
- aba[2000-12-17 00:40:00] - who saw dude where's my car and where's the review?
- aba[2000-12-16 18:31:00] - Yay! The message board is back! -Paul
[2000-12-16 16:37:00] - the fish is going to starve... hehe
[2000-12-16 16:36:00] - Dude, were is my brain?
[2000-12-16 14:07:00] - home is cold. brrrrr.
[2000-12-16 14:06:00] - <><
[2000-12-16 13:09:00] - I owe Vinnie $1.40 and I owe Paul $0.40 and Dude Where's My Car was the worst movie ever. That doesn't mean "don't go see it" but wow, it was dumb.
[2000-12-15 22:43:00] - you've got mail! . . . it's not spam! . . . hehehe, i love aol ~a
[2000-12-15 17:19:00] - i am lonley
[2000-12-15 17:17:00] - boo!
[2000-12-15 12:06:00] - yay for message boards - aba
[2000-11-28 08:19:00] - ujlkj
[2000-11-28 03:25:00] - penis pie
[2000-11-27 02:12:00] - Hey everyone, I go to VT and am looking for some companionship, anyone know a loose female I can get drunk?
[2000-11-27 01:55:00] - Nevermind, I know now (-+-)
[2000-11-27 01:11:00] - Who said "yay paul!" and how did they know it was me?
[2000-11-26 21:59:00] - you think dvorak is confusing only because it is different . . . i say it is much less confusing than qwerty ~a
[2000-11-26 21:58:00] - dvorak is very yum
~a[2000-11-26 21:40:00] - dvorak is very confusing
- aba[2000-11-26 21:38:00] - yay paul!
[2000-11-26 15:52:00] - Sushi is good
[2000-11-26 15:49:00] - i like big butts
[2000-11-26 11:57:00] - does anyone else like sushi? - aba
[2000-11-24 14:05:00] - fishy wishy was a fish!
[2000-11-24 10:32:00] - http://www.agameaday.com/
[2000-11-24 10:21:00] - i know. i just wanted to comment on the 123.
[2000-11-24 00:28:00] - since i can't get a warftp server to work, i can't update my webpage from home . . . don't worry, the fish is getting fed
~a[2000-11-23 12:18:00] - "fish fed 123 hours ago"
[2000-11-23 12:18:00] - moomoomoo. happy turkeyday. even for those who don't eat turkey (like me). - aba
[2000-11-23 00:13:00] - I'm sorry, it was am. I checked the message board Tuesday and no one had posted, and I was busy Wednesday. Sorry
[2000-11-22 22:27:00] - moot now
[2000-11-22 11:33:00] - my computer at tech stopped responding
At least it made it until Wednesday...[2000-11-21 22:27:00] - is that am or pm?
[2000-11-21 13:31:00] - I think it is probably going to start early..... maybe around 10:00 or 11:00?
[2000-11-21 13:09:00] - ugh. home computer sucks. wanna go back to vt. damn 14" monitor.
- aba[2000-11-20 23:56:00] - what time? ~a
[2000-11-20 15:26:00] - Anyone here interested in watching anime at Paul's house this Wednesday?
[2000-11-20 15:05:00] - fish is not getting hungry . . . can't update stupid fish thing from home . . . he is getting fed
~a[2000-11-19 22:33:00] - I think your fish are getting hungry. -David
[2000-11-19 07:16:00] - lookin for xmen d/l
[2000-11-16 15:07:00] - thanksgiving needs not be spent at home ~a
[2000-11-16 12:32:00] - not be spent at home. - Xpovos
[2000-11-16 12:31:00] - While I will admit the joy of being away from parents comes close to outweighing the pain of long weeks of class, I remind you that a Fall Break need
[2000-11-16 11:25:00] - yes, i agree. i like being away from home for so long. then it means that i don't hate it for thanksgiving. - aba
[2000-11-16 11:24:00] - fish fed 17 hours ago
[2000-11-16 02:52:00] - agreed ~a
[2000-11-16 02:40:00] - I don't mind 11 weeks of being free (ie, away from parents)
[2000-11-16 01:42:00] - everyone should switch to @@@/dvorak.html !!!
[2000-11-16 01:04:00] - have 11 straight weeks of hideous hideous class. - Xpovos
[2000-11-16 01:03:00] - I will start the intelligent conversation, if no one else will. I hearby propose we get Tech to give us some form of Fall break, so that we do not
[2000-11-15 22:22:00] - hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
[2000-11-13 16:56:00] - BLARG!
[2000-11-13 15:19:00] - $01
[2000-11-13 15:19:00] - $--
[2000-11-13 14:53:00] - 44
[2000-11-12 21:34:00] - that was my point ~a
[2000-11-12 21:28:00] - We had semi-intelligent conversations over the summer, no? -- Xpovos
[2000-11-12 21:26:00] - test
[2000-11-12 17:32:00] - adrian is hot
[2000-11-12 16:49:00] - I'm sorry Adrian, it's all my fault
[2000-11-12 14:57:00] - intelligent conversations are over rated
[2000-11-12 01:14:00] - so much for intelligent conversations on my webpage
~a[2000-11-11 03:26:00] - browne rules
[2000-11-11 03:26:00] - they all suck
[2000-11-09 22:04:00] - say hello to fish
[2000-11-08 00:40:00] - bush sucks
[2000-11-08 00:40:00] - gore sucks
[2000-11-05 17:50:00] - @@@/home.html
[2000-11-05 05:11:00] - Dewey has content on his webpage now! <a href=http://dweand.campus.vt.edu/journal>Here</a>
[2000-11-04 02:30:00] - vihao say hi
[2000-11-04 02:29:00] - peter is a dork
[2000-11-02 22:15:00] - cs2704 project hasn't been done yet!
man polymorphism | more[2000-11-02 22:14:00] - hm...just come across your page from cslab
prev <-> next