here are old message board entries

---

prev <-> next

[2001-12-02 23:59:18] - "there is a set of few people who i'd litterally kill if i had the chance. it consists of david phish, derek mcman, mike brown, and paul wolfensbusomething, and katie."

[2001-12-02 23:02:38] - it might help just a teeny bit, but it's definitely not worth the gobs of money that people throw at it. - mig

[2001-12-02 22:58:53] - bah, all that test prep is bullshit.  i made it to tj without any of that. - mig

[2001-12-02 22:55:09] - paul: well, it is called the "Scholastic Aptitude Test," not "how much money do your parents make?" -jdb

[2001-12-02 22:47:18] - jdb: How is that interesting? -paul

[2001-12-02 22:37:44] - nothing matters, except............. building evil robots. - wolf

[2001-12-02 22:36:51] - nothing i did in high school had any bearing on what i did in college.  and i don't expect college to have been useful, either. - wolf

[2001-12-02 22:36:15] - oh well.  let them waste their time and money trying to get into a specific high school.  - wolf

[2001-12-02 22:34:41] - yes. - wolf

[2001-12-02 22:32:43] - reminds me how... interesting it is that economic status is the top indicator of students' performance on exams such as SAT. -jdb

[2001-12-02 22:14:50] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A42099-2001Nov30.html  Don't know if this was posted before.  About TJ entrance exams. - dewey

[2001-12-02 21:11:14] - wolf: Oh, I see. -paul

[2001-12-02 21:10:26] - more specifically, it's a page about nothing. it exists just to look pretty. - wolf

[2001-12-02 20:50:57] - paul: nope. - wolf

[2001-12-02 19:43:00] - wolf: I don't understand that web-page at all. Am I missing something? -paul

[2001-12-02 17:59:27] - http://www.feralgoat.com/devolution/ ... project for digital art class i'm working on.  should be steady changes going on till tuesday. - wolf

[2001-12-02 14:28:22] - kris:    ~a

[2001-12-02 13:18:36] - mmm, vim components. i want this for IE in windows. http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim/gnome-vim.png -jdb

[2001-12-02 13:16:32] - a: Ah, I see. So the key is to discover your tolerance, and then stick to a consistent drinking schedule to make sure you stay drunk but not overdo it? -paul

[2001-12-02 12:47:00] - not a good time to be non-religious in america. -jdb

[2001-12-02 12:32:48] - ugh ugh ugh -jdb

[2001-12-02 11:43:37] - http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-120201prayer.story -kris

[2001-12-02 11:23:28] - i meant real scientists just don't pay much attention to the bible. -jdb

[2001-12-02 11:06:07] - jdb: i think you said real scientists ignore when old laws are disproven. I was giving examples of "real scientists" who didn't ignore that kind of stuff, who would be classified as pretend scientists based on you said. I think there's been confusion. - aaron

[2001-12-02 10:49:46] - http://www.chiomegasecrets.com/ so funny - wolf

[2001-12-02 09:38:40] - i took a philosophy course on this, but that was first semester freshman year, so i don't remember any of it. - wolf

[2001-12-02 06:11:06] - paul: most people don't have enough control.  they just get drunk quickly.  ~a

[2001-12-02 01:45:12] - i don't think you automatically become a "pretend scientist" if your work is disproven. -jdb

[2001-12-02 01:38:39] - Oh yeah. Those guys like Galileo and Copernicus who were preaching Heliocentricity, disproving accepted scientific fact and stuff...  they were just pretend scientists - aaron

[2001-12-02 01:36:17] - why waste your time disproving something that obviously: 1) based totally on blind faith or 2) needs a constant stream of "revised" interpretation. -jdb

[2001-12-02 01:35:19] - but real scientists just ignore it. -jdb

[2001-12-02 01:31:23] - The difference is that when scientific laws are disproven, we get over it and find new laws. people have been clinging to the bible for, what, 1000 years now? - aaron

[2001-12-02 01:28:08] - i don't think the bible is the most disproven book of all history... i think dynamic practices, like *drumroll* science are the most disproven things in history. but, that's the point. -jdb

[2001-12-02 01:27:24] - why are laser-light swords more acceptable than real swords? - aaron

[2001-12-02 01:26:23] - http://www.coxnews.com/newsservice/stories/2001/1121-MOVIE-MASK-COX.html Soon you'll be able to transform R-rated movies to PG or even G versions with the help of "Movie Mask" digital software from Trilogy Studios - aaron

[2001-12-02 01:20:54] - Well we've already had two or three different links posted here, about various contradictions in the bible... don't think we need to go through that again - aaron

[2001-12-02 01:06:49] - mig: how's that? -jdb

[2001-12-01 20:33:52] - bleeeeh

[2001-12-01 15:01:40] - i would say probably most disproven book in all of history. - mig

[2001-12-01 14:30:41] - what kind of fruit? -cryptic

[2001-12-01 12:13:40] - he's a fruit in person sometimes too. -kris

[2001-12-01 11:47:25] - hehe "most proven book in history" - aaron

[2001-12-01 11:18:17] - a: Why wouldn't you be able to keep a buzz for six hours? -paul

[2001-12-01 04:51:26] - i want to buy an evil robot  ~a

[2001-12-01 04:50:55] - who would guess i can keep a buzz for six hours?  ~a

[2001-12-01 04:50:23] - best buzz ever!  ~a

[2001-12-01 03:41:24] - adrian's having fun, I gather - boing

[2001-12-01 01:12:56] - soooooooooooooo happppppppppppppy -drunk

[2001-11-30 23:18:43] - unfortunately for god, the laws of katie's evil robots (tm) are even higher! - wolf

[2001-11-30 21:54:11] - a: The law of god is higher then any of the laws of man -paul

[2001-11-30 21:38:21] - bah; when i think of *law* i always think of governmental laws  ~a

[2001-11-30 20:24:49] - i suppose it had to do with the 10 commandments - mig

[2001-11-30 19:32:04] - i read that one a few days ago.  i never understood the title.  ~a

[2001-11-30 18:58:34] - http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/5007/5007_01.asp a new tract for your viewing displeasure.  remember kids, all non-christians are heartless cunts. - mig

[2001-11-30 18:40:48] - bleh

[2001-11-30 16:27:43] - "The enemy has declared war on us," he said. "And we must not let foreign enemies use the forums of liberty to destroy liberty itself" oh the irony. - mig

[2001-11-30 16:24:52] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nyt/20011130/ts/president_defends_secret_tribunals_in_terrorist_cases_1.html - mig

[2001-11-30 15:16:28] - http://www.plif.com/archive/wc126.gif  (too big) -jdb

[2001-11-30 14:57:42] - that thomas kurek guy is a fruit!

[2001-11-30 14:22:00] - NTC comes with my apartment.  It's far better than the DSL that was here. -logan

[2001-11-30 13:21:41] - unsigned: thanks for the compliment -paul

[2001-11-30 12:36:03] - awww.  why's it too big?

[2001-11-30 12:35:29] - http://www.sinfest.net/comics/sf20000127.gif  (too big)  it's paul!

[2001-11-30 10:29:05] - grad students go on strike http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/11/29/grad.student.strike.ap/index.html -jdb

[2001-11-30 10:25:35] - http://www.photolib.noaa.gov/ ... tons of public-domain photographs for all your graphic design needs. - wolf

[2001-11-30 10:07:03] - mig: gattaca; cool movie! -jdb

[2001-11-30 09:42:00] - http://www.collegiatetimes.com/local/headlines/viewHeadlines.asp?cityID=12858&headlineID=1542 interesting read

[2001-11-30 09:30:25] - logan: you get the isp that you deserve. - wolf

[2001-11-30 09:19:09] - http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-000094697nov28.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions - wolf

[2001-11-30 09:11:14] - from the adequacy board - "Nonsense - a pedophile is someone with a disgusting fetish for feet. That's not the same thing at all." - mig

[2001-11-30 08:49:20] - http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1683000/1683873.stm anyone watch gattaca? - mig

[2001-11-30 08:47:14] - oh goody, the right one is all mine!

[2001-11-30 07:33:18] - the article and the comments below are amusingn too. - mig

[2001-11-30 03:33:28] - http://www.adequacy.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/11/20/94827/169    the censored images amuse me.  -  aba

[2001-11-30 02:29:36] - imacs can suck my left testicle

[2001-11-30 00:50:36] - imacs are cool!

[2001-11-30 00:47:33] - http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/23107.html well fuck. - mig

[2001-11-29 22:51:06] - logan:  well what do you expect?  they have a picture of an imac on their front page  ~a

[2001-11-29 22:07:46] - http://science.gmu.edu/~aparna/cartoon.gif (too big)

[2001-11-29 21:56:28] - http://www.ntc-com.com I believe. -logan

[2001-11-29 21:56:17] - The people that provide ethernet at my apartment.  They have a nice pipe to campus. -logan

[2001-11-29 20:29:29] - logan:  what is ntc?  ~a

[2001-11-29 18:52:03] - all part of the libertarian plot

[2001-11-29 18:00:18] - Just another example of how governments attempt to control thoughts in order to entrench their own power. -logan

[2001-11-29 17:08:43] - the, rather

[2001-11-29 17:08:31] - chick tracts will just piss off some of teh people who read them  - wolf

[2001-11-29 17:07:53] - the problem with the non-tracts is that they'll most likely try to blame free@vt. - wolf

[2001-11-29 16:50:07] - gots to protect poor oppressed men. -El Dildo Bandito

[2001-11-29 16:35:46] - http://www.ifeminists.com/introduction/editorials/2001/1127.html Stolen artwork an attempt at censorship? -paul

[2001-11-29 16:13:32] - http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/11/29/wrace29.xml&sSheet=/portal/2001/11/29/por_right.html EU to try to outlaw racism -paul

[2001-11-29 16:09:36] - http://www.ffrf.org/nontracts/ -jdb

[2001-11-29 16:09:14] - or... we could distribute a bunch of non-tracts. -jdb

[2001-11-29 16:03:03] - wolf: go for it! -jdb

[2001-11-29 15:14:52] - a:  i would do so as well if people didn't take them so seriously.  remember that this guy makes a lot of money out of those abominations. - mig

[2001-11-29 14:58:36] -

[2001-11-29 14:56:57] - ( that was supposed to be a sneaky face)

[2001-11-29 14:53:09] - nobody would really know if you put chick tracts in the holders, though > - wolf

[2001-11-29 14:51:09] - http://www.rdp.vt.edu/tablecard/ is the rdp's table card policy - wolf

[2001-11-29 14:50:47] - not chick tracts, unfortunately  it was put out by some national baptist group.  i didn't read the whole thing... it basically said "christmas is coming; remember that jesus died!!!" etc. - wolf

[2001-11-29 14:27:15] - were they as bad as the chick tracts?  i'm compelled to distribute chick tracts because they mock christianity soo well.  ~a

[2001-11-29 14:23:18] - so maybe i ought to write a letter of some sort to the rdp? - wolf

[2001-11-29 14:18:51] - a

[2001-11-29 14:17:19] - b:

[2001-11-29 13:54:01] - a:

[2001-11-29 13:53:56] - yes. - mig

[2001-11-29 13:43:29] - wolf: officially, cards are supposed to go through Lori Greiner and then you get scheduled something like 2 dining rooms at a time to distribute cards in. -jdb

[2001-11-29 13:42:02] - wolf: yes, they have to be approved. -jdb

[2001-11-29 12:23:09] - she's in my geology group.  i very well could.  she's sent it to you more than once?  ~a

[2001-11-29 12:22:07] - someone tell vicky rose to stop sending me sircam. - mig

[2001-11-29 12:18:28] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011127/us/brf_attacks_insurance_fraud_1.html whoops. - mig

[2001-11-29 12:15:20] - jdb: i like the "hate time" one.  it's interactive!    ~a

[2001-11-29 12:11:50] - i wonder if they would disapprove of me making up cards with just pictures of donkeys or cauliflower on them. - wolf

[2001-11-29 12:11:22] - these weren't even cards... just little tract thingies. - wolf

[2001-11-29 11:46:11] - wolf: I know when Andrew and I put our LIbertarians at VT cards in the Depot at Dietrick, one of the managers carefully looked it over before he gave us permission -paul

[2001-11-29 11:32:17] - what's the rdp's policy on the cards that go in he napkin holders?  don't they have to be approved first? - wolf

[2001-11-29 11:31:49] - interesting.  i just found religious tracts in all the napkin holders at hokie grill. - wolf

[2001-11-29 11:16:13] - http://www.lp.org/press/op-eds.php?function=view&record=20 Drawing a connection between US foreign policy and the 9-11 attacks -paul

[2001-11-29 10:39:11] - lots of interesting flash-based cartoons http://www.markfiore.com/index.html -jdb

[2001-11-29 09:38:33] - http://espn.go.com/mlb/columns/neyer_rob/42798.html were 25 of the 30 baseball teams really in the red? - mig

[2001-11-29 04:06:27] - that's not just crazy, it's sinister - boing

[2001-11-29 04:05:54] - how about 3 out of 4 approving wiretapping of conversations between "suspected" terrorsists and their attorneys - boing

[2001-11-29 02:08:36] - 6 in 10 americans are for the special military tribunals?!  that's crazy!  ~a

[2001-11-29 01:44:16] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30704-2001Nov28.html Most americans back measures bush has taken. Some scary quotes in here -paul

[2001-11-28 22:07:19] - note-- i didn't post that for the petition, rather for the interesting flash animation. enjoy. -jdb

[2001-11-28 21:56:46] - http://www.actforchange.com/liberty/flash.html -jdb

[2001-11-28 21:48:57] - me? flirt? yeah right. (she was rubbing my leg under the table.) -jdb

[2001-11-28 20:32:18] - jdb: I was reading that while you were sitting there flirting with my girlfriend. -logan

[2001-11-28 20:31:50] - That's not shocking; anybody could tell you that Republicans aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer. -logan

[2001-11-28 20:29:04] - bomb threat at vt http://www.vt.edu/2000/headline.phtml?itemid=477 -jdb

[2001-11-28 20:26:42] - greening of the republican party http://www.tompaine.com/opinion/2001/11/26/index.html -jdb

[2001-11-28 18:44:38] - What did I redefine? -logan

[2001-11-28 18:41:02] - sorry my page was down.  i was feeling depressed so i turned it off and went to bed.  ~a

[2001-11-28 13:58:02] - don't let it happen to you!!! - wolf

[2001-11-28 13:57:53] - only he's about 40 years old, is convinced he's a literary genius, and stalks blizzard employees. - wolf

[2001-11-28 13:57:09] - i know someone else who does that, too. - wolf

[2001-11-28 13:56:12] - logan: you have a nasty habit of redefining words to worm your way out of a valid argument. - wolf

[2001-11-28 13:47:02] - http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,317637-412,00.shtml

[2001-11-28 13:31:49] - yesh.  ~a

[2001-11-28 13:22:35] - is it enabled on your apache server? - mig

[2001-11-28 13:22:06] - i can teach you php. - mig

[2001-11-28 12:33:39] - who wants to teach me java or php?  ~a

[2001-11-28 10:44:53] - Governments only support certain arbitrary rights when and where it's convenient for them. -logan

[2001-11-28 10:44:27] - You get the rights you claim, and if you accept and tolerate government that does not grant you certain rights, then you are at the very least implicitly waiving such rights. -logan

[2001-11-28 10:43:44] - jdb: I do not subscribe to your hypothesis. -logan

[2001-11-28 10:32:46] - logan: or... is there some sort of special qualifier you have for statements like "one has whatever rights one chooses to claim and defend?" -jdb

[2001-11-28 10:28:23] - logan: if governments are here to protect our rights, and we get the government we deserve, do we get the rights we deserve? -jdb

[2001-11-28 10:16:27] - I don't see the connection between the two. -logan

[2001-11-28 10:15:51] - logan: you don't see a conflict in those 2 statements? -jdb

[2001-11-28 10:05:38] - It's a common saying. -logan

[2001-11-28 09:57:26] - http://www.emode.com/dog/

[2001-11-28 09:43:39] - http://www.emode.com/tests/rockstar/

[2001-11-28 08:04:42] - "people get the government that they deserve. -- logan"

[2001-11-28 00:19:43] - I need to sleep, I can explain it more some other time. -logan

[2001-11-28 00:18:59] - Yes.  Except for given.  Priveleges are given. -logan

[2001-11-28 00:16:48] - logan: earned? granted? given? chosen? -jdb

[2001-11-28 00:12:35] - It has nothing to do with "deserving" anything. -logan

[2001-11-27 21:50:45] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011127/ts/military_tribunals_2.html finally, some democrats grow some testicles. - mig

[2001-11-27 21:37:25] - oh yeah!  right now i rule nova!  no one is here to dispute my rule! - mig

[2001-11-27 21:36:12] - mig: tough luck for you too, punk. nova is all mine. -jdb

[2001-11-27 21:34:43] - so in your case, it's tough luck for the old man.  maybe he should have hired some guards. -  mig

[2001-11-27 21:28:59] - the way i think logan sees it, if you aren't able to defend your rights, you don't deserve to have them. - mig

[2001-11-27 21:22:42] - logan: is it possible for people to lose their rights along the way? if an old man is incapable of defending his home from a josh-takeover (damn liberal u.s. gun laws ), does he forfeit his right of property ownership? -jdb

[2001-11-27 21:20:22] - paul: i don't know. -jdb

[2001-11-27 21:04:32] - jdb: Didn't you see me mention how I have nothing against killing babies (per se) the other day? -logan

[2001-11-27 21:00:18] - jdb: Ok, do you think they should be using the government to push their agenda or should they just be like watchdogs? -paul

[2001-11-27 20:55:15] - paul: well, if i had to pick an answer from those choices... i'd keep them both around for a while. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:54:02] - jdb: So do you think we need women's groups and men's groups or only one or neither? -paul

[2001-11-27 20:51:17] - logan: i take it you are not an adovcate of baby rights and animal rights? -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:50:50] - paul: a very hard thing to answer in a broad way. so: yes and no. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:50:35] - paul: if equal rights means equal access to air to breathe, etc., then sure, men and women have equal rights. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:49:49] - paul: if equal rights include things such as treatment, then i don't believe that men and women already have equal rights. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:49:38] - paul: i suggested contextualizing the question because everything has a context. in closed environments, such as the class that i ta for, i believe that men and women have equal rights. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:47:38] - One has whatever rights one chooses to claim and defend. -logan

[2001-11-27 20:43:43] - jdb: Contextualize? Um... I don't know if I can. I mean, do you think there is a reason for groups like NOW and that Men's rights group to exist or do men and women already have equal rights? -paul

[2001-11-27 20:37:54] - paul: contextualize your question. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:35:52] - jdb: So do you think men and women have equal rights? -paul

[2001-11-27 20:33:45] - mig: I would say it isn't wrong because there is no victim -paul

[2001-11-27 20:32:57] - a: No problem. It's a tough question to answer and I don't ask it to be difficult, I am just curious. -paul

[2001-11-27 20:32:39] - well... in any sort of objective sense. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:31:34] - we certainly can't create a threshold for "oppression validity" can we? -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:19:32] - cryptic: i'm not bashing the idea... so. 1) there should be. 2) you're right. who cares. 3) i doubt any. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:16:38] - I agree it may be redundant, but what harm can more effort towards similar goals cause? =Þ -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:14:55] - why shouldnt there be a comparable movement for minority men as there is for all women? and what does it matter if they form a seperate group bringing together pieces and parts from many different movements? -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:13:00] - the (all-encompassing) gay rights movement does not include black straight men.... -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:12:10] - i remember there was a rapper who got arrested for violating his probation, for recording "violent" rap music. - mig

[2001-11-27 20:11:20] - why should it be distancing themselves? -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:10:52] - jdb: agreed, for the most part white males control the world.... but minority men, as well as all women, should be equal, and are equal (whether or not they are treated as such is a different story)... -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:10:52] - for groups such as gay men, black men, gay black republican men, etc. -- why should these male activists distance themselves, for example, from the [all-encompassing] gay rights movement? -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:09:27] - some men are.... not all.  -cryptic

[2001-11-27 20:08:40] - i'm with you there cryptic... i mean, what you write in your journal is your own business, and should not be considered wrong or a crime.  I don't know how they can consider that a violation of his probation, or anything - boing

[2001-11-27 20:08:12] - but are they the tyrants that minority and women's groups paint them out to be?

[2001-11-27 20:07:27] - cryptic: in the broad sense though, men rule the world. white men in particular. -jdb

[2001-11-27 20:00:37] - royally messed up..... fucked up, in fact -cryptic

[2001-11-27 19:58:58] - I think it's messed up though -cryptic

[2001-11-27 19:58:49] - I dont think it's wrong -cryptic

[2001-11-27 19:58:10] - jdb: there are many cases where men dont have equal rights.... minorities for example -cryptic

[2001-11-27 19:57:56] - do you think it's wrong, paul? - mig

[2001-11-27 19:56:18] - paul:  i haven't answered your question not because i didn't see it or am ignoring you.  i just don't know how to answer it.  ~a

[2001-11-27 19:49:06] - "working toward establishing equal rights for men and the improvement of men's lives" <-- since when do men not have equal rights? of course, they could be referring to more-than-equal rights. -jdb

[2001-11-27 18:48:33] - jdb: You can probably read about that on their philosophy page (the link I posted) under "purpose" -paul

[2001-11-27 18:47:25] - jdb: I know there is a difference between wrongness and illegality, I was just wondering why Adrian thought it was wrong -paul

[2001-11-27 17:55:32] - paul: so why does this men's activism site exist? -jdb

[2001-11-27 17:26:56] - since "wrong" doesn't always mean illegal -- although "wrong" often leads to illegal down the road... -jdb

[2001-11-27 17:26:06] - paul: doesn't matter why he thinks it's wrong. -jdb

[2001-11-27 16:02:00] - http://www.mensactivism.org/philosophy.shtml I found the second paragraph of "Women's Violence and the Portrayal of Women" to be particularly interesting... -paul

[2001-11-27 15:59:25] - a: Just to play devil's advocate, why do you think it is wrong? -paul

[2001-11-27 15:53:51] - as are so many many other things.  ~a

[2001-11-27 15:53:37] - my oppinion:  wrong but not illegal  ~a

[2001-11-27 15:25:20] - http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20011120_646.html ACLU appeals ruling in Ohio case involving man who wrote fantasies about child molestation -paul

[2001-11-27 14:39:03] - "That claim is simply ludicrous. America has done more than any other nation in the 20th century to ensure the spread of freedom and democracy around the world. "  wow. i can't tell if he's being serious or not. - mig

[2001-11-27 14:35:38] - well, chalk up another ignorant opinion letter to the ct. - mig

[2001-11-27 14:32:25] - agreed.  strip clubs for all! (boooo)... very well, strip clubs for none! (boooo)... hmm... strip clubs for some, miniature american flags for others! (yaaaay!) - boing

[2001-11-27 14:30:11] - and boo to tennesee. - mig

[2001-11-27 14:24:11] - if there is a demand for the plates saying "choose life", then there's nothing wrong with filling that demand.  after all, no one is forcing you to buy those plates. - mig

[2001-11-27 14:21:48] - boing:  not like that's particularly relevant anyway.  people have a right to put whatever they want on their cars. - mig

[2001-11-27 14:20:45] - you can't just claim that any expression that's biblical is therefore religious - boing

[2001-11-27 14:20:25] - the bible is a translation anyway, so what's to stop me from creating my own translation of it that has "and the Lord spake, 'Oklahoma is OK'" - boing

[2001-11-27 14:19:23] - i really don't think that license plate violates separation of church and state.  "choose life" is not inherently a religious statement, even though it "appears" in the bible - boing

[2001-11-27 14:12:20] - eep - aaron

[2001-11-27 13:58:35] - aaron is so cool http://www.collegiatetimes.com/local/headlines/viewHeadlines.asp?cityID=12858&headlineID=1460 -jdb

[2001-11-27 13:47:42] - i don't know anyone else who's in command of that many weapons of mass destruction. - mig

[2001-11-27 13:38:59] - i think bush ought to arrest himself, if that's the case. - mig

[2001-11-27 13:38:40] - Bush said yesterday that he was not consciously expanding his list of possible targets by citing countries, like Iraq, that possess weapons of mass destruction. "I've always had that definition, as far as I'm concerned," Bush said.

[2001-11-27 13:37:30] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19205-2001Nov26.html

[2001-11-27 13:32:16] - http://www.nashvillescene.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?story=This_Week:Politics:License_To_Strip A southern Tennessee county clamps down on sex businesses -paul

[2001-11-27 13:29:37] - http://www.thedailycamera.com/news/boulder/21aart.html More artwork stolen from the Boulder Public Library -paul

[2001-11-27 13:24:27] - http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/florida/sfl-fplates22nov22.story?coll=sfla%2Dnews%2Dflorida Does a "choose life" license plate violate the seperation of church and state? -paul

[2001-11-27 12:21:49] - http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2827111,00.html?chkpt=zdnnp1tp02 Supreme Court to consider a Bush administration bid to revive the 1999 Child Online Protection Act -paul

[2001-11-27 11:59:49] - http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2001/11/05/tomo/story.gif (too big)

[2001-11-27 11:35:25] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19269-2001Nov26.html Anthrax scare may put the Post Office out of business -paul

[2001-11-27 01:18:43] - mmm... panties http://www.pantscam.com/

[2001-11-26 23:38:26] - paul:  i think the problem is that bush himself misinterperted what he said. - mig

[2001-11-26 23:25:39] - wolf:  yes - abe

[2001-11-26 22:51:17] - a: http://www.cdcd.vt.edu/PJD/Const.Status/main.html#studserv -jdb

[2001-11-26 22:49:56] - abe : want to see a real lincoln log? - wolf

[2001-11-26 22:47:50] - wolf: administrative building. -jdb

[2001-11-26 22:47:22] - mysterious commie: oh, now i understand why the cold war ended. -jdb

[2001-11-26 22:44:31] - a: No, wait, that's GT3, nevermind, sorry -paul

[2001-11-26 22:44:10] - a: Travis has it -paul

[2001-11-26 22:38:09] - gta3 looks cool.  ~a

[2001-11-26 22:35:28] - "harriet tubs men" would work better.  tub is a verb.

[2001-11-26 22:33:33] - a new dorm  ~a

[2001-11-26 22:33:11] - does anyone know what they're building/digging for behind harper? - wolf

[2001-11-26 22:32:47] - "Harriet Rubs men" ?

[2001-11-26 22:32:03] - i can't think of anything else. - wolf

[2001-11-26 22:31:59] - *** cryptic backs off.... especially since he's being pushy and argumentative

[2001-11-26 22:31:40] - "ronald reagan gets on on with hot young russian men!!!"

[2001-11-26 22:29:13] - "honest abe lincoln xxx-treme emancipation proclamation exposed!!! parts 1 and 2"

[2001-11-26 22:28:34] - cryptic: Fine fine, Bush is wrong and you are right -paul

[2001-11-26 22:28:12] - I should not say "All college students are drunk", when I mean to say "wolf is wasted out in the middle of the street" -cryptic

prev <-> next