here are old message board entries



prev <-> next

[2001-02-28 18:11:00] - http://aparna.dhs.org/gilmore.txt

[2001-02-28 18:01:00] - stupid virginians who had to fall for his stupid no car tax.  >:o  -  aba

[2001-02-28 18:00:00] - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A64207-2001Feb27.html  republicans suck.  unless you like higher tuition fees.

[2001-02-28 17:37:00] - @@@/hehe.mp3

[2001-02-28 14:39:00] - @@@/pics/hellokitty.gif

[2001-02-28 13:32:00] - what i don't get is that you seem to be on the same side as i am.... -dave

[2001-02-28 13:32:00] - which is generally a republican view. democrats like big government and spending more money -dave

[2001-02-28 13:31:00] - and i agree, it's not a responsible thing to do to make the government bigger and bigger and spend more and more money -dave

[2001-02-28 13:30:00] - he's going to do it with the huge surplus we have. the democrats want to take the huge surplus and make the government bigger. -dave

[2001-02-28 13:11:00] - http://www.sgi.com/flatpanel/  yum!  :)

[2001-02-28 13:10:00] - http://conversatron.com/convers.py?topic=31808

[2001-02-28 12:32:00] - haha.  that was really funny, miguel.  :D  -  aba

[2001-02-28 12:29:00] - esp since he's not very good with his math - mig

[2001-02-28 12:24:00] - which brings my point is to how gdubbya is going to come up with 200 billion a year to pay off the debt. - mig

[2001-02-28 12:23:00] - which brings my 2 problems with this.  a)  the government is getting bigger, and thus it is spending more and more. b) by spending more and more the debt is increasing.  i don't know about you, but that's not a responsible way to handle money - mig

[2001-02-28 12:14:00] - yes, but when they spend to make the government bigger, they spend too much, thus increasing the debt, - mig

[2001-02-28 11:59:00] - besides, the debt isn't just like a loan from the bank they have to pay back, it's mostly social security -dave

[2001-02-28 11:59:00] - they've had a surplus for awhile, but haven't paid down the debt. they'd rather spend it making bigger government -dave

[2001-02-28 09:47:00] - i meant to paste that link into my address bar, not the message board :P - vinnie

[2001-02-28 09:47:00] - gah, sorry

[2001-02-28 09:46:00] - http://www.ctnow.com/scripts/editorial.dll%3feetype%3darticle&eeid=4069391&render=y&table=&ck=&ver=2.5

[2001-02-28 08:22:00] - dammit i need a new keyboard - mig

[2001-02-28 08:21:00] - if they could spent money to pay the debt, they would have, i don't see any excuse why they wouldn't have. - mig

[2001-02-28 08:13:00] - "7761 - 2-27 5:14p" - folks, i have determined that it is too hard to parse links with &s in them . . . it is ambiguous whether the & is part of the link or after it . . . please don't use them, thanks ~a

[2001-02-28 07:40:00] - i think britney spears prancing around in her underwear is ten times more explicit than the word vagina on a billboard.  -  aba

[2001-02-28 06:29:00] - it's not that they couldn't pay it down before, it's that they chose not to. -dave

[2001-02-28 02:27:00] - http://www.ctnow.com/scripts/editorial.dll?eetype=Article&eeid=4069391&render=y&Table=&ck=&ver=2.5 -jdb

[2001-02-27 23:58:00] - that means that 200 billion a year is going solely to paying the debt?(not counting interest).  If the government couldn't even pay one penny to the decrease the debt the last 15 or so years, how are they going to magically do it now? - mig

[2001-02-27 23:54:00] - sorry for skepticism's but i don't see that happening. - mig

[2001-02-27 23:53:00] - i just want something i can never have  :'(

[2001-02-27 23:44:00] - bush's budget supposedly pays down 2 trillion of the debt over 10 years -dave

[2001-02-27 23:35:00] - http://conversatron.com/convers.py?topic=31702

[2001-02-27 23:28:00] - nin: "god money's not looking for the cure/god money's not concerned about the sick among the pure/god money let's go dancing on the backs of the bruised/god money's not one to choose"

[2001-02-27 23:24:00] - http://conversatron.com/convers.py?topic=31726

[2001-02-27 23:22:00] - http://agave.as.arizona.edu/~chrisg/mooreslaw/Paper.html

[2001-02-27 22:43:00] - http://www.theonion.com/onion3707/video_game_violence.html - haha

[2001-02-27 22:41:00] - fuckity fuck fuck fuck?    - mig

[2001-02-27 22:37:00] - i think the whole point of the article was trying to show that this whole use of budget surpluses is trying to get less attention to the fact that the debt is still increasing because the government is bad at managing money - mig

[2001-02-27 22:37:00] - What's wrong? - Aaron

[2001-02-27 22:35:00] - fuckityfuckingfuckfuckfuckfuckingfuckfuckityfuck

[2001-02-27 22:35:00] - or we've been supposadly told - mig

[2001-02-27 22:34:00] - but isn't that what some of the surplus is used for? - mig

[2001-02-27 22:31:00] - like i said earlier, it doesn't matter how big the surplus is, the debt can still go up if you don't use it to pay down the debt -dave

[2001-02-27 22:27:00] - http://www.mushycat.com/buttons/button0225.gif

[2001-02-27 22:27:00] - i don't know about this year. - mig

[2001-02-27 22:26:00] - they claimed we've been having surpluses for the last couple years, but the national debt is still going up?  something doesn't add up - mig

[2001-02-27 22:26:00] - who knows, i think it's beyond both you and me to figure out = ) -dave

[2001-02-27 22:25:00] - yeah, but do they do it correctly? - mig

[2001-02-27 22:22:00] - it's like taking your salary for the coming year, and saying how much you want to spend for each thing in the coming year -dave

[2001-02-27 22:22:00] - i'm talking to paul and andrew and doing homework.  this is what is being dropped.  bye you guys.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 22:21:00] - hehe, budgets aren't really about spending credit, or money you don't have. -dave

[2001-02-27 22:21:00] - hehe, i like the url, very objective = ) -dave

[2001-02-27 22:20:00] - it's typically not a good idea to spend money you don't actually have though.  take credit cards for instance.  look how many people are in debt because of it.  And that's just one person.  This problem is on a national level. - mig

[2001-02-27 22:20:00] - http://www.democrats.org/sotu/taxfacts/details.html  -  aba

[2001-02-27 22:19:00] - i think there probably are some, but he is also increasing funds for some as well -dave

[2001-02-27 22:19:00] - what programs is he not paying for aparna? -dave

[2001-02-27 22:19:00] - that way, you know how much money you have to work with..how much you can use for different things etc etc -dave

[2001-02-27 22:18:00] - well i think that's more about budget's paul. i mean when you make a personal budget, it project how much you think you will make for a year and then what you think your expenses will be for the coming year -dave

[2001-02-27 22:17:00] - and another thing on the military, if we have a good defense, then how could we run out of missles from one small action in kosovo? -dave

[2001-02-27 22:17:00] - he is using the surplus to pay back the deficit not to pay for existing programs -  aba

[2001-02-27 22:17:00] - Why can't we just spend money we already have instead of spending money that we think we might have? Then we won't have to worry about a surplus or deficit -paul

[2001-02-27 22:16:00] - so it can't be borrowing money from other places and claiming it as income -dave

[2001-02-27 22:16:00] - the surplus is projected miguel, it's what some government agency thinks will come in from taxes for the coming years -dave

[2001-02-27 22:15:00] - i agree that it doesn't have to be big enough to crush the world 100 times over. -dave

[2001-02-27 22:15:00] - it's called borrowing money from other places and claiming it's income. - mig

[2001-02-27 22:15:00] - i mean, defense is one of the main reasons for government. -dave

[2001-02-27 22:14:00] - and i don't know everything about national defense, but i do think that clinton cut it a little more than he should have. -dave

[2001-02-27 22:14:00] - it doesn't matter how much of a surplus you have, if you dont use it to pay down the debt, then it won't get smaller -dave

[2001-02-27 22:13:00] - like i don't think it's too hard to see how the debt could increase even when you have a surplus... -dave

[2001-02-27 22:13:00] - A national defense, not a national offense -paul

[2001-02-27 22:13:00] - i think there are several things wrong with that article miguel -dave

[2001-02-27 22:12:00] - the military isn't that important.  all we need is a standing army and some weapons.  we don't need enough firepower to kill the world's population 100 times over. - mig

[2001-02-27 22:10:00] - http://mickeyj.dhs.org/harrybrowne.txt - hmmm... what surplus? - mig

[2001-02-27 22:09:00] - and if you don't think we should now, like paul said, when should we? -dave

[2001-02-27 22:09:00] - we're having the biggest surpluses in like forever, so we really should have a tax cut -dave

[2001-02-27 22:08:00] - i'm not sure that it should be as big as he wants it to be, but there should definitely be one -dave

[2001-02-27 22:08:00] - and i think that you're right to a certain extent aparna, but i do think a tax cut of some magnitude should be given -dave

[2001-02-27 22:07:00] - you don't think the military is important miguel? -dave

[2001-02-27 22:01:00] - you were unarguably being racist, i am surprised more people weren't yelling at you  ~a

[2001-02-27 22:00:00] - andrew, that isn't nice  ~a

[2001-02-27 21:54:00] - And seeing as I'm once again comfortably on the bar, I bid you adieu. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:51:00] - No, no, adrian, I've learned my lesson, I'm going to do my best never to say anything ever again.  People threaten me with violence, call me names, and then insist I'm the one who's being mean. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:51:00] - i wouldn't mind if he was cutting money out of stuff we didn't need (nuclear weapons and other military shit) - mig

[2001-02-27 21:50:00] - andrew, i wish you wouldn't post just so you can have posts . . . only post when you have something to say  ~a

[2001-02-27 21:50:00] - Services that you think the government is suppose to provide, some think otherwise. Besides, if we can't cut taxes now, when can we cut them? -paul

[2001-02-27 21:49:00] - which argument's are weak? - mig

[2001-02-27 21:49:00] - bush promises people more money though personal tax cuts, but people fail to realize that he is taking away important services and rights that the government is supposed to provide.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:45:00] - Because we are spending too much as it is ;-) -paul

[2001-02-27 21:43:00] - I -could- answer every one of those really weak arguments, but I won't.  I'm sticking by my promise, and as soon as I hit 15 I'm going back to studying. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:43:00] - well, tell bush that.  he's cutting fucking huge chunks out of our spending.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:42:00] - i'm not making anything difficult.  i am simply stating my opinion.  if you have to do homework, don't read the message board at the same time  :\  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:41:00] - What if we have a surplus though? Then we don't have to cut anything -paul

[2001-02-27 21:41:00] - I'm just here to get 15 posts. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:41:00] - http://www.democrats.org/sotu/index.html

[2001-02-27 21:41:00] - You're making this difficult on me. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:40:00] - and tax cuts can hurt a lot of people because of the spending cuts associated with them.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:39:00] - i disagree with the tax cut because it is stupid, that's why.  :D  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:38:00] - tax cuts hurt no one. I'll say no more, because I'm already breaking my resolution as it is. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:37:00] - I can definitely see why Aparna would be against a tax cut, because it's across the board instead of targeted -paul

[2001-02-27 21:36:00] - i think he wants very badly to be like his father (yet he forgets that his father was a sucky president too)  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:36:00] - i don't believe in tax cuts that hurt those who really can't represent themselves well (ie the homeless).  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:36:00] - You, the tax-cut.  You're the only one I can think of who'd be objecting to this, excpet maybe miguel. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:32:00] - http://www.gop.org/newsroom1/0227_104.htm

[2001-02-27 21:31:00] - http://www.democrats.org/news/releases/rel022601.html

[2001-02-27 21:24:00] - who are you talking to andrew?  and against what?  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:22:00] - Character education? -paul

[2001-02-27 21:22:00] - I will no comment on this, save to say, what on earth do you have against it? -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:21:00] - Triple funding for character education! Yeah! :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 21:15:00] - bush is on tv right now talking about it.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 21:14:00] - http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/gwbush/bushtaxprpsl.pdf

[2001-02-27 21:12:00] - Must.... refrain.... from..... commenting..... -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 21:11:00] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010227/pl/taxes_democrats_dc_1.html

[2001-02-27 20:55:00] - Nah, I've got enough of my own, besides, I don't think he wants the grade I'd get for the assignments, even if I did my absolute best. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:51:00] - heh.  if anyone wants to do his homework, so he can add more bells and whistles to this page, feel free to talk to him.  ;)  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:49:00] - Wow, this system gets more complex everytime I see it. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:48:00] - horray for adrian then. - mig

[2001-02-27 20:43:00] - i dunno if you guys know this, but the post assignation thing goes first by tag and then by ip, so if you forget to sign the post, it really doesn't matter in a way.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:42:00] - Or I could just forget to sign my handle and have done with the whole foolishness.  D'oh! -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:41:00] - But since I'm not debating I guess that means I'll have to go with random posts.

[2001-02-27 20:41:00] - I'd like to reclaim -a- spot on the message board.  Though it was pretty cool when I was in first for a while. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:40:00] - i used to know the answers to more questions than i do now.  god damn, i've forgotten a lot since tj.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:37:00] - We could both go and both suck at it then Miguel! :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 20:35:00] - too bad i suck at these kinds of things, otherwise it would be fun - mig

[2001-02-27 20:34:00] - i emailed the president, and i have a file of sample questions if anyone is interested.  they are *hard* questions, but it looks kind of cool.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:33:00] - yeah.  i think it's basically it's ac continued.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:32:00] - What is it? Kind of like college Jeopardy? -paul

[2001-02-27 20:31:00] - http://filebox.vt.edu/org/academic/index.html  <--  i'm thinking of going to practices, in case anyone is interested.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:29:00] - The fact that we disagree on so many issues... well, not much to be done about that. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:29:00] - I don't consider you stupid, aparna.  Honestly you're one of the few women I know who is willing to speak her mind, and for that I admire you. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:28:00] - That's not too bad considering he is a misogynist :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 20:24:00] - i'm kind of resigned to my fate as "hysterical, stupid female" in his eyes.  :\  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:24:00] - heh.  you may not have been referring to me, paul, but andrew sure was.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:24:00] - I really wasn't talking about anybody but myself. I can't debate when I am upset, I tend to lash out at people, message board veterans can attest to this -paul

[2001-02-27 20:23:00] - And did my mom really say that Adrian? -paul

[2001-02-27 20:22:00] - nonononononononononononononono, I was not referring to anyone. Actually, I was referring to myself -paul

[2001-02-27 20:22:00] - i think you are referring to me.  and what you are calling irrational anger, actually had a very logical base.  :\  -  aba

[2001-02-27 20:20:00] - that's what your mom said  ~a

[2001-02-27 20:20:00] - It's best to debate when in a good mood, else other things can cloud judgement and cause irrational anger -paul

[2001-02-27 20:17:00] - I'm in a very agitated mood, so I don't think debating would be a good thing for me, and esp. not for the people I was debating against.  So I shall refrain. -- xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:06:00] - Well I can assure you that you won't be making me mad tonight, I'm in too docile a mood -paul

[2001-02-27 20:03:00] - Doesn't matter which side I take even, I'd be sure to make someone angry. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 20:02:00] - You talking about your thoughts on porn? I can't possibly see how anyone could find that offensive ;-) -paul

[2001-02-27 20:01:00] - I promise I won't say a word about this issue.  I'd only upset someone. -- Xpovos

[2001-02-27 19:46:00] - At least that's my assumption, if you want real answers I suggest you ask a female since they have a unique perspective that I don't -paul

[2001-02-27 19:42:00] - And when people say that porn degrades women, I think they are referring to the belief that if men watch porn they tend to see women as sex toys or objects and not people -paul

[2001-02-27 19:33:00] - I believe the argument is that people who view pornography have a statistically higher chance of raping or sexually molesting someone -paul

[2001-02-27 19:16:00] - i'm also not aware of what the current form of prostitution is.  when i think of "prostitution" i think of the definition:  the act of paying money for sex.  so i apologize for my ignorance, aparna - mig

[2001-02-27 19:10:00] - well i'm not talking about participants being not willing -dave

[2001-02-27 19:09:00] - i guess it can be, if the participants are not willing.  - mig

[2001-02-27 19:05:00] - i'm not sure exactly how that works.... -dave

[2001-02-27 19:05:00] - don't people say a lot of times that porn is bad because it degrades women? -dave

[2001-02-27 19:03:00] - stuff like prostitution rings i think are bad, which is what i think you were refferring to

[2001-02-27 19:02:00] - i wasn't asking about the current form of prostitution, aparna.  i was asking why the act of paying money for sex was bad?  Though its my fault you misinterpreted because i was being vague. - mig

[2001-02-27 19:01:00] - i guess one difference between porn and prostitution could be that some people are forced to be prostitutes whereas not many people are forced to make porn -dave

[2001-02-27 18:59:00] - There is nothing wrong with prostitution as long as it is done willingly by all parties -paul

[2001-02-27 18:58:00] - this is disregarding the fact that it is illegal of course -dave

[2001-02-27 18:56:00] - but what if it is someone's source of income and they do it willingly? -dave

[2001-02-27 18:56:00] - i think prostitution is bad if people force other people to be prostitutes -dave

[2001-02-27 18:44:00] - but prostitution (at least in its current form) is definitely veryveryvery bad.  there's no doubt in my mind about that.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 18:43:00] - i don't think porn is necessarily bad, i just thought that it was an interesting website (the antiporn one), so i posted the link.  i can see why other people think it is bad though.  it is very degrading in a lot of ways.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 18:42:00] - http://www.salon.com/sex/col/vitz/2000/10/17/johns/  i posted this before, but it is relevent now so i will post it again  -  aba

[2001-02-27 18:40:00] - i can't believe you asked that, miguel  -  aba

[2001-02-27 18:22:00] - if anyone who knows perl wants to find a way to get better matching colors (like you see in the status bar above) . . . here is what i have now @@@/findcolor.txt . . . im me if you have any ideas  ~a

[2001-02-27 18:11:00] - fuck enter key got stuck again

[2001-02-27 18:11:00] - and why is prostitution bad? - mig

[2001-02-27 18:10:00] - people are entertained by different things, some people like baseball, some people like concerts, and some people like porn - mig

[2001-02-27 18:10:00] - it's ok to dislike porn, but you have no right to tell someone else they cannot view porn. - mig

[2001-02-27 18:04:00] - I don't think those exist , but if they did, you would be right - aaron

[2001-02-27 18:01:00] - Some strip clubs have no victims, like lego strip clubs -paul

[2001-02-27 18:00:00] - Lego porn, for example, has no victims :-) - aaron

[2001-02-27 18:00:00] - Strip clubs are worse than some porn, yes, I think

[2001-02-27 17:59:00] - I see, so strip clubs are worse then porn? -paul

[2001-02-27 17:58:00] - Strip clubs? Well they encourage the sexual exploitation of women/men. Just like prostitution is bad, it's kind of the same reason. - aaron

[2001-02-27 17:55:00] - And why is this page called "mr. iou" now? -paul

[2001-02-27 17:53:00] - How are strip clubs bad? -paul

[2001-02-27 17:45:00] - That makes my fifteenth post and therefore my minty hue greets the posting graph up top! - aaron

[2001-02-27 17:45:00] - True, things like strip clubs and rape jokes and child pornography and such all are bad and have victims but there are plenty of friendlier forms of pornography - aaron

[2001-02-27 17:44:00] - I don't think it's fair to say that ALL porn is bad. Some porn is good and some porn is bad. - aaron

[2001-02-27 17:15:00] - aparna, i have a hard time believing that too  ~a

[2001-02-27 17:14:00] - folks, i have determined that it is too hard to parse links with &s in them . . . it is ambiguous whether the & is part of the link or after it . . . please don't use them, thanks  ~a

[2001-02-27 16:58:00] - i think you'd be surprised . . . .  -  aba

[2001-02-27 16:52:00] - That's not right. 25-30% of men would rape a female if they knew they could get away with it? I don't believe that -paul

[2001-02-27 16:47:00] - sorry, adrian, I might've forgotten the opening <

[2001-02-27 16:46:00] - http://boing.dhs.org/images/gif/gendertest.gif - boing

[2001-02-27 16:15:00] - Aaron: You are correct; this is Josh Baugher. -jdb

[2001-02-27 16:13:00] - http://www.collegiatetimes.com/ctonline/article.php3?361022 -jdb

[2001-02-27 16:11:00] - http://www.oneangrygirl.net/antiporn.html

[2001-02-27 16:05:00] - and the order is restored . . . . ;)

[2001-02-27 16:05:00] - laurel thatcher ulrich:  "well-behaved women rarely make history."  -  aba

[2001-02-27 16:03:00] - http://www.oneangrygirl.net/marilyn.gif

[2001-02-27 15:59:00] - http://www.mushycat.com/buttons/button0160.gif  =-O

[2001-02-27 15:56:00] - http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/science/A23722-2001Feb18.html

[2001-02-27 15:43:00] - Dancing paul is very cool indeed :-) :-) - aaron

[2001-02-27 15:35:00] - (and that was aba)

[2001-02-27 15:35:00] - yesr

[2001-02-27 15:34:00] - dancing paul is funny.  :)  -  aba

[2001-02-27 15:34:00] - Who is JDB? Is that josh baugher? - aaron

[2001-02-27 15:34:00] - it's not like it is a very serious test.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 15:30:00] - http://www.dancingpaul.com/ -jdb

[2001-02-27 15:25:00] - 64.  Which breakfast cereal are you most like in bed? h) Honey Bunches of Oats....?! I don't get these questions - Aaron

[2001-02-27 15:24:00] - i thought that was a stupid question too.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 15:21:00] - 21.  And how nicely decorated is your place?  a) Like a college dorm room... Hmmmmm.... - Aaron

[2001-02-27 15:20:00] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010227/od/cannibals_dc_1.html

[2001-02-27 15:05:00] - http://www.emode.com/passion/

[2001-02-27 13:09:00] - http://aparna.dhs.org/pics/earth.jpg

[2001-02-27 13:04:00] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010227/od/nude_dc_1.html

[2001-02-27 13:03:00] - http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010227/od/climber_dc_1.html

[2001-02-27 12:57:00] - Only one can? You can take more then that! 5 shots of tequila for the man! -paul

[2001-02-27 12:55:00] - it said i was female, but i was right in the middle of the scale and it gave me the shemale picture.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:54:00] - bring on the beer then! only one can please = ) -dave

[2001-02-27 12:54:00] - http://www.salon.com/sex/col/vitz/2000/10/17/johns/index.html

[2001-02-27 12:54:00] - did you take it aparna? did it say you were a girl? -dave

[2001-02-27 12:53:00] - Obviously in order to qualify as a man, we need to drink ourselves silly Dave :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 12:52:00] - not too sure if pierce took the test.  send him the link.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:52:00] - it called ryan a man too.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:51:00] - Did Pierce take the test? -paul

[2001-02-27 12:50:00] - and 'lo and behold, adrian is the only one with a gf! -dave

[2001-02-27 12:50:00] - it called everyone a girl but adrian.... -dave

[2001-02-27 12:49:00] - haha.  poor paul.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:48:00] - Stupid Spark gender test -paul

[2001-02-27 12:46:00] - calling me girly huh? -dave

[2001-02-27 12:46:00] - it's ok, the spark said you were female anyway.  :P  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:46:00] - It's also the color for communists :-( -paul

[2001-02-27 12:45:00] - I said red was a girly color, almost as bad as purple :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 12:45:00] - paul did.  :)  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:45:00] - and who ever said red was a girly color? -dave

[2001-02-27 12:44:00] - i used to be a different color.  i forget which.  maybe blue or something.  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:44:00] - -dave

[2001-02-27 12:44:00] - Lunch at Dietrick at 1:00. Ping pong afterwards for those who want to come.

[2001-02-27 12:43:00] - Nah, it's ok. I've already established red as a color to be feared on the message board. I can always pretend it represents the blood of my enemies or something -paul

[2001-02-27 12:41:00] - you could always ask adrian to change it  -  aba

[2001-02-27 12:37:00] - Damn right red goes better with grey. Too bad red is such a girly color :-( -paul

[2001-02-27 12:36:00] - red goes better with grey than orange (sorry travis)

[2001-02-27 12:35:00] - Yay! I am back in first! My pledge is fulfilled -paul

[2001-02-27 12:32:00] - Every rose has it's thorn

[2001-02-27 12:31:00] - http://www.salon.com/sex/col/vitz/2001/02/27/soul_mate/index.html

[2001-02-27 12:30:00] - someone post something meaningful  >:0

[2001-02-27 12:21:00] - I thought that article was interesting too :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 12:18:00] - http://www.jeffs.place.found.org.uk/insults.htm

[2001-02-27 12:17:00] - wow, look at the first six bars. it goes in the order of the color spectrum - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:17:00] - Mmmmmmmm intelligent agents amazing! Apology aaron interuption - aaron

[2001-02-27 12:17:00] - ha ha ha. but i wanna see it! :P - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:16:00] - Not telling -paul

[2001-02-27 12:15:00] - when is it going to be broadcast? - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:14:00] - so it was taped? I knew it! - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:13:00] - Horribly. I hate TV and I hate cameras -paul

[2001-02-27 12:13:00] - how did your interview thing go? - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:13:00] - hey, you're not in philosophy! - vinnie

[2001-02-27 12:12:00] - Yupyup, it's my philosophy class telling me to challenge everything :-) -paul

[2001-02-27 12:10:00] - which i guess is true in a way - vinnie

prev <-> next